Enhancing portfolio optimization with multi-LLM sentiment aggregation: A Black-Litterman integration approach
Type of the article: Research Article AbstractSentiment analysis of financial text data plays a crucial role in investment decision-making, yet existing approaches often rely on single-model sentiment scores that may suffer from biases or hallucinations. This study aims to enhance portfolio optimization by integrating sentiment signals from multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) into the Black-Litterman framework. The proposed method aggregates sentiment scores from three finance-domain fine-tuned LLMs using a Long Short-Term Memory network, which captures non-linear relationships and temporal dependencies to produce a robust Meta-LLM sentiment score. This score is then incorporated into the Black-Litterman model as investor views to derive optimal portfolio weights. The methodology is tested on a portfolio of S&P 500 stocks. The results show that the proposed approach significantly improves portfolio performance, achieving an annualized return of 31.22%, compared to 24.57% for the market capital-weighted portfolio. Additionally, the model attains a Sharpe Ratio of 3.02, an Omega Ratio of 2.48, and a Jensen’s Alpha of 1.95%, outperforming both the benchmark portfolios and portfolios based on single-LLM sentiment. The findings demonstrate that aggregating sentiment from multiple LLMs enhances risk-adjusted returns while mitigating model-specific limitations. Future research could explore the integration of LLMs with different architectures to further refine sentiment-aware portfolio strategies.
Authors
- Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8565-0760)
- John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-1156)
Institutions
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Investment Management and Financial Innovations
- Published
- 2025-08-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(3).2025.16
- Primary Topic
- Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00