Nivolumab

The Formulary Management Expert Committee (FMEC) recommends that nivolumab in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N + AVD) be reimbursed for the first-line treatment of stage III and stage IV classic Hodgkin lymphoma in patients 12 years of age and older, provided certain conditions are met. N + AVD should only be reimbursed for the first-line treatment of stage III and stage IV classic Hodgkin lymphoma in patients 12 years of age and older who do not have significant active autoimmune disease. When comparing N + AVD to brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with doxorubicin (Adriamycin), vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD), no price reduction is required to achieve cost-effectiveness, given that N + AVD has a lower drug cost and better clinical outcomes. Based on the Canada’s Drug Agency assessment of the clinical evidence, it was determined that there is not enough evidence to justify a greater cost for N + AVD compared with BV in combination with doxorubicin (Adriamycin), vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (BV + AVEPC).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Health Technologies
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2025.1190
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nivolumab

CDA-AMC
Canadian Journal of Health Technologies
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Nivolumab

CDA-AMC
article en

Abstract

The Formulary Management Expert Committee (FMEC) recommends that nivolumab in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N + AVD) be reimbursed for the first-line treatment of stage III and stage IV classic Hodgkin lymphoma in patients 12 years of age and older, provided certain conditions are met. N + AVD should only be reimbursed for the first-line treatment of stage III and stage IV classic Hodgkin lymphoma in patients 12 years of age and older who do not have significant active autoimmune disease. When comparing N + AVD to brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with doxorubicin (Adriamycin), vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD), no price reduction is required to achieve cost-effectiveness, given that N + AVD has a lower drug cost and better clinical outcomes. Based on the Canada’s Drug Agency assessment of the clinical evidence, it was determined that there is not enough evidence to justify a greater cost for N + AVD compared with BV in combination with doxorubicin (Adriamycin), vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (BV + AVEPC).

Canadian Journal of Health TechnologiesVol. 5(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nivolumab — CDA-AMC · Canadian Journal of Health Technologies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS