WITHDRAWN

Although artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to veterinary diagnostics, its real-world implementation faces a unique set of challenges.Unlike in human healthcare where AI systems are developed under structured regulations and validated using large, standardized datasets, veterinary medicine operates with less regulatory oversight, more heterogeneous data, and fewer resources.These conditions hinder the development of trustworthy, generalizable, and ethically sound AI tools.This scoping review critically examines the current landscape of AI in veterinary diagnostics, with a focus on the conceptual and technical challenges that impact its clinical adoption.To map the landscape and refine our search strategy, we initially conducted a manual exploratory search, followed by a systematic search in PubMed Central, which identified studies published as early as 2013 through June 2025.After screening using AI-assisted methods followed by manual review, sixty-three articles met the inclusion criteria and were used for this review.Our analysis categorized challenges in adopting AI in veterinary diagnostics into three groups: data acquisition, model development, and implementation.Issues such as limited data were explicitly acknowledged by most articles, while lack of transparency and external validation were identified as the most common potential limitations.We also highlight possible solutions to support more responsible and effective clinical adoption.

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/gy9pz_v1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WITHDRAWN

AI in cancer detection
article

WITHDRAWN

article en

Abstract

Although artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to veterinary diagnostics, its real-world implementation faces a unique set of challenges.Unlike in human healthcare where AI systems are developed under structured regulations and validated using large, standardized datasets, veterinary medicine operates with less regulatory oversight, more heterogeneous data, and fewer resources.These conditions hinder the development of trustworthy, generalizable, and ethically sound AI tools.This scoping review critically examines the current landscape of AI in veterinary diagnostics, with a focus on the conceptual and technical challenges that impact its clinical adoption.To map the landscape and refine our search strategy, we initially conducted a manual exploratory search, followed by a systematic search in PubMed Central, which identified studies published as early as 2013 through June 2025.After screening using AI-assisted methods followed by manual review, sixty-three articles met the inclusion criteria and were used for this review.Our analysis categorized challenges in adopting AI in veterinary diagnostics into three groups: data acquisition, model development, and implementation.Issues such as limited data were explicitly acknowledged by most articles, while lack of transparency and external validation were identified as the most common potential limitations.We also highlight possible solutions to support more responsible and effective clinical adoption.

Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.