Exploring the Reddit Narratives: A Deep Dive Into Pro-choice Conversations (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Background: Conflicting views regarding pro-life and pro-choice issues have garnered significant attention during the 2024 presidential debates in the US. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to explore the narratives of pro-choice participants on the Reddit platform, specifically within the abortion subreddit (r/abortion). </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> Two random samples of posts were collected: the first from March 20 to March 25, 2025, and the second from April 27 to May 15, 2025. For analytical purposes, the data were categorized based on four primary themes: type of abortion (surgical or medical, such as mifepristone or misoprostol), classification of pregnancies (unintended or intended), and significant sentiments articulated in the discussions. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The analysis revealed consistent findings across varying data collection durations. A predominant preference for medical abortion was noted, with frequent mentions of misoprostol in participant narratives. A significant proportion of individuals reported complications during this process. Moreover, despite the intentional nature of their pregnancies, the participants expressed emotional distress before abortion. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The discussions presented in Reddit highlight that a significant barrier to accessing abortion care in the US encompasses various issues, including knowledge awareness, affordability, accessibility, mobility, and the repercussions of conflicting policies. Researchers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers must recognize reproductive challenges that adversely affect various communities. Addressing these issues is crucial for improving the overall public health and ensuring equitable access to reproductive services. </sec>