No dilute core produced in simulations of giant impacts on to Jupiter

ABSTRACT A giant impact has been proposed as a possible formation mechanism for Jupiter’s dilute core – the planet’s inferred internal structure in which the transition between its core of heavy elements and its predominantly hydrogen–helium envelope is gradual rather than a discrete interface. A past simulation suggested that a head-on impact of a $10~\mathrm{ M}_{\rm{\oplus }}$ planet into an almost fully formed, differentiated Jupiter could lead to a post-impact planet with a smooth compositional gradient and a central heavy-element fraction as low as $Z\approx 0.5$. Here, we present simulations of giant impacts on to Jupiter using improved numerical methods to reassess the feasibility of this scenario. We use the REMIX smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) formulation, which has been newly developed to improve the treatment of mixing in SPH simulations. We note that, as in previous works, chemical mixing is not included in these models and that incorporating such processes at sub-particle scales could improve numerical convergence. We perform giant impact simulations with varying speeds, angles, pre-impact planet structures, and equations of state. In all of our simulations, heavy elements re-settle over short time-scales to form a differentiated core, even in cases where the core is initially disrupted into a transiently mixed state. A dilute core is not produced in any of our simulations. These results, combined with recent observations that indicate Saturn also has a dilute core, suggest that such structures are produced as part of the extended formation and evolution of giant planets, rather than through extreme, low-likelihood giant impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1105
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No dilute core produced in simulations of giant impacts on to Jupiter

L. F. A. Teodoro, R. Massey, Thomas D. Sandnes, Jacob Kegerreis et al.
2 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Astro and Planetary Science
2.31
article

No dilute core produced in simulations of giant impacts on to Jupiter

L. F. A. Teodoro, R. Massey, Thomas D. Sandnes, Jacob Kegerreis, V. R. Eke
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT A giant impact has been proposed as a possible formation mechanism for Jupiter’s dilute core – the planet’s inferred internal structure in which the transition between its core of heavy elements and its predominantly hydrogen–helium envelope is gradual rather than a discrete interface. A past simulation suggested that a head-on impact of a $10~\mathrm{ M}_{\rm{\oplus }}$ planet into an almost fully formed, differentiated Jupiter could lead to a post-impact planet with a smooth compositional gradient and a central heavy-element fraction as low as $Z\approx 0.5$. Here, we present simulations of giant impacts on to Jupiter using improved numerical methods to reassess the feasibility of this scenario. We use the REMIX smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) formulation, which has been newly developed to improve the treatment of mixing in SPH simulations. We note that, as in previous works, chemical mixing is not included in these models and that incorporating such processes at sub-particle scales could improve numerical convergence. We perform giant impact simulations with varying speeds, angles, pre-impact planet structures, and equations of state. In all of our simulations, heavy elements re-settle over short time-scales to form a differentiated core, even in cases where the core is initially disrupted into a transiently mixed state. A dilute core is not produced in any of our simulations. These results, combined with recent observations that indicate Saturn also has a dilute core, suggest that such structures are produced as part of the extended formation and evolution of giant planets, rather than through extreme, low-likelihood giant impacts.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 542(2)
Ames Research Center (US), University of Oslo (NO), Durham University (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (US)
Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Astro and Planetary Science
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.