Crises of acknowledgement: oblique actions and ominous verbs

Abstract Acknowledging other human beings, especially when they speak a language foreign to us, comport themselves in ways we find illegible, makes manifest just how difficult the work of acknowledgement is. But the pitfalls in devoting oneself to such work are of a piece with those woven into the fabric of acknowledging others with whom we share a culture. The author of this article explores the work of acknowledgement, in light of both its Wittgensteinian inspiration and some surprising implications of paying close attention to several important claims made by J. L. Austin in ‘A Plea for Excuses’. The ‘natural economy of language’ might work against acknowledging our complicity in nothing less than the annihilation of others, especially those who speak, act, look, and in respects appear to be so different from ourselves. While our relationship to others tends to be, as Emerson noted, ‘oblique and casual’, killing in even a figurative sense is, as Austin suggested, ‘a verb of omen’. Arguably, oblique actions have more to do with ominous verbs than we appreciate—or tend to acknowledge. Such, at least, is what the author tries to render plausible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhaf061
Primary Topic
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crises of acknowledgement: oblique actions and ominous verbs

Vincent Colapietro
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
article

Crises of acknowledgement: oblique actions and ominous verbs

Vincent Colapietro
article en

Abstract

Abstract Acknowledging other human beings, especially when they speak a language foreign to us, comport themselves in ways we find illegible, makes manifest just how difficult the work of acknowledgement is. But the pitfalls in devoting oneself to such work are of a piece with those woven into the fabric of acknowledging others with whom we share a culture. The author of this article explores the work of acknowledgement, in light of both its Wittgensteinian inspiration and some surprising implications of paying close attention to several important claims made by J. L. Austin in ‘A Plea for Excuses’. The ‘natural economy of language’ might work against acknowledging our complicity in nothing less than the annihilation of others, especially those who speak, act, look, and in respects appear to be so different from ourselves. While our relationship to others tends to be, as Emerson noted, ‘oblique and casual’, killing in even a figurative sense is, as Austin suggested, ‘a verb of omen’. Arguably, oblique actions have more to do with ominous verbs than we appreciate—or tend to acknowledge. Such, at least, is what the author tries to render plausible.

Journal of Philosophy of EducationVol. 59(5-6)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Rhode Island (US), African Studies Centre (NL), University of the Humanities (MN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.