Henry George and Clark's Paradigm

Henry George (1839–1897) was among the most widely read economists of his era,yet he has remained a systematically marginalized figure in the subsequent history of economic thought. This essay contends that his influence is indispensable for understandingthe conceptual foundations of modern economics—and, in particular, the paradigmestablished by John Bates Clark (1847–1938). Clark collapsed land into capital, dissolving it as a distinct factor of production. This marked a paradigmatic shift, driven bypolitical pressures rather than scientific reasoning: it was formulated in direct responseto George’s radical proposal to socialize the economic rent of land. To make this case, theessay begins with a methodological critique of orthodox economics through the lens ofthe philosophy of science, in particular with respect to the definition of capital. George’sideas are situated in their historical context, reconstructing his ethical and scientificreasoning and his extraordinary, if often overlooked, influence in the Anglo-Saxon worldand beyond. It concludes by assessing the continuing relevance of George’s insights andby exposing the limitations of Clark’s paradigm, which still shapes economic theory andpolicy today.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ep2a6_v1
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Natural History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Henry George and Clark's Paradigm

Nicolaus Tideman, Niels Charlier
Archaeology and Natural History
article

Henry George and Clark's Paradigm

Nicolaus Tideman, Niels Charlier
article en

Abstract

Henry George (1839–1897) was among the most widely read economists of his era,yet he has remained a systematically marginalized figure in the subsequent history of economic thought. This essay contends that his influence is indispensable for understandingthe conceptual foundations of modern economics—and, in particular, the paradigmestablished by John Bates Clark (1847–1938). Clark collapsed land into capital, dissolving it as a distinct factor of production. This marked a paradigmatic shift, driven bypolitical pressures rather than scientific reasoning: it was formulated in direct responseto George’s radical proposal to socialize the economic rent of land. To make this case, theessay begins with a methodological critique of orthodox economics through the lens ofthe philosophy of science, in particular with respect to the definition of capital. George’sideas are situated in their historical context, reconstructing his ethical and scientificreasoning and his extraordinary, if often overlooked, influence in the Anglo-Saxon worldand beyond. It concludes by assessing the continuing relevance of George’s insights andby exposing the limitations of Clark’s paradigm, which still shapes economic theory andpolicy today.

Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Archaeology and Natural History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.