THE PATRIARCHY INDEX FOR ASIA: A PRAGMATIC TOOL FOR CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER INEQUALITIES

Gender inequality remains a persistent barrier to development in many parts of Asia, yet thedomestic foundations of this inequality—particularly within family systems—are oftenneglected in global measurement tools. This study introduces the Patriarchy Index (PI), a newmetric constructed from census microdata to capture gendered power hierarchies in familiesacross 22 Asian and North African countries and 652 subnational administrative units.Of particular interest to development practitioners and scholars, the PI offers a scalable, lowcosttool for subnational diagnostics, especially where standard measures of gender equality aremissing or fail to reflect private-sphere constraints on women’s autonomy. Our study addresseswhether domestic arrangements—such as patterns of co-residence, marriage timing, and agebasedauthority—can reliably capture institutionalized patriarchy, and what regional variationthese patterns reveal.Using harmonized IPUMS-I census microdata and eleven theoretically grounded indicators, weconstruct a multidimensional composite index empirically validated through convergence withexisting gender measures, divergence from unrelated metrics, and correlation with gendereddevelopment outcomes. Our study finds that family-based patriarchy is spatially clustered andhighly variable at the subnational level. It further shows that higher PI values are significantlyassociated with reduced relative female labor force participation, even after controlling forstructural variables such as gross national income and urbanization.These results underscore the PI’s value as a complementary measure: it captures dimensions ofgender inequality that remain invisible to public-facing or outcome-based indicators and helpsbridge the gap between domestic constraints and broader patterns of disenfranchisement. Incontexts where legal reform and female empowerment are pursued without addressinghousehold-level structures, the PI offers a diagnostic that speaks directly to the architecture offamily systems—illuminating where and how deeper constraints on gender equality endure.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/m8f7b_v1
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE PATRIARCHY INDEX FOR ASIA: A PRAGMATIC TOOL FOR CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER INEQUALITIES

Mikołaj Szołtysek, Bartosz Ogórek, Siegfried Gruber, Mateusz Grzyb
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

THE PATRIARCHY INDEX FOR ASIA: A PRAGMATIC TOOL FOR CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER INEQUALITIES

Mikołaj Szołtysek, Bartosz Ogórek, Siegfried Gruber, Mateusz Grzyb
article en

Abstract

Gender inequality remains a persistent barrier to development in many parts of Asia, yet thedomestic foundations of this inequality—particularly within family systems—are oftenneglected in global measurement tools. This study introduces the Patriarchy Index (PI), a newmetric constructed from census microdata to capture gendered power hierarchies in familiesacross 22 Asian and North African countries and 652 subnational administrative units.Of particular interest to development practitioners and scholars, the PI offers a scalable, lowcosttool for subnational diagnostics, especially where standard measures of gender equality aremissing or fail to reflect private-sphere constraints on women’s autonomy. Our study addresseswhether domestic arrangements—such as patterns of co-residence, marriage timing, and agebasedauthority—can reliably capture institutionalized patriarchy, and what regional variationthese patterns reveal.Using harmonized IPUMS-I census microdata and eleven theoretically grounded indicators, weconstruct a multidimensional composite index empirically validated through convergence withexisting gender measures, divergence from unrelated metrics, and correlation with gendereddevelopment outcomes. Our study finds that family-based patriarchy is spatially clustered andhighly variable at the subnational level. It further shows that higher PI values are significantlyassociated with reduced relative female labor force participation, even after controlling forstructural variables such as gross national income and urbanization.These results underscore the PI’s value as a complementary measure: it captures dimensions ofgender inequality that remain invisible to public-facing or outcome-based indicators and helpsbridge the gap between domestic constraints and broader patterns of disenfranchisement. Incontexts where legal reform and female empowerment are pursued without addressinghousehold-level structures, the PI offers a diagnostic that speaks directly to the architecture offamily systems—illuminating where and how deeper constraints on gender equality endure.

Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE PATRIARCHY INDEX FOR ASIA: A PRAGMATIC TOOL FOR CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER INEQUALITIES — Mikołaj Szołtysek, Bartosz Ogórek, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS