Tool Development and Testing: An Objective Measurement of Medication Administration Competency

Nurses are largely responsible for the safety of medication administration when providing direct patient care. Educators require objective tools to assess and evaluate medication administration skills. Thus, the Objective Medication Administration Tool (OMAT©) was created. The development of the OMAT was guided by standards, evidence, and the competency outcomes and performance assessment theoretical model. Thirteen experts assessed the OMAT for content validity. Item content validity indexes ranged .89 to 1.0. Scale content validity average was .98. Interrater reliability was established among five trained raters. Cohen kappa values ranged .89 to .98. Findings provide preliminary support for the validity and reliability of the OMAT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Education Perspectives
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000001452
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tool Development and Testing: An Objective Measurement of Medication Administration Competency

Ginger Schroers, Jill Pfieffer
1 citations
Nursing Education Perspectives
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
article

Tool Development and Testing: An Objective Measurement of Medication Administration Competency

Ginger Schroers, Jill Pfieffer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nurses are largely responsible for the safety of medication administration when providing direct patient care. Educators require objective tools to assess and evaluate medication administration skills. Thus, the Objective Medication Administration Tool (OMAT©) was created. The development of the OMAT was guided by standards, evidence, and the competency outcomes and performance assessment theoretical model. Thirteen experts assessed the OMAT for content validity. Item content validity indexes ranged .89 to 1.0. Scale content validity average was .98. Interrater reliability was established among five trained raters. Cohen kappa values ranged .89 to .98. Findings provide preliminary support for the validity and reliability of the OMAT.

Nursing Education PerspectivesVol. 46(5)
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.