The Copenhagen Adduction Exercise Effect on Sport Performance and Injury Prevention: A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis

The popularity of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise (CAE) has risen in recent years. This review aims to evaluate the available evidence on the isolated use of the CAE for both performance enhancement and injury prevention. This systematic review included prospective interventional studies investigating the effect of the CAE on strength and conditioning and injury prevention outcomes. 15 studies were included, comprising randomized controlled trials (n = 4), cluster-randomized controlled trials (n = 6), and pre-post trials (n = 5). These studies assessed adduction and abduction strength, jump and sprint performance, core endurance, dynamic balance, adductor longus muscle thickness, and the seasonal prevalence of groin injuries. Meta-analyses of within-group changes and between-group comparisons were performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and relative risk (RR). The implementation of the CAE yielded large effect sizes for adduction (within-group SMD = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.41 to 1.0; between-group SMD = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.18 to 1.7) and abduction (within-group SMD = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.47 to 1.4; between-group SMD = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.33 to 1.56) strength. Adduction strength adaptations were dependent on the repetitions performed (adherence-adjusted repetitions: p = 0.02; adherence-adjusted weekly repetitions: p = 0.0063). Dynamic balance can also be improved using the CAE (within-group SMD = 3.9). The CAE showed no statistically significant effect on seasonal groin injury prevalence (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.41 to 1.68). There were no additional benefits of the intervention for other performance metrics, and the quality of evidence underpinning all findings was rated as very low. The inclusion of the CAE can be recommended for adductor strength training, although current evidence does not support its use for reducing the risk of sustaining groin injuries. Registration Number: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CA7JW.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70119
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Copenhagen Adduction Exercise Effect on Sport Performance and Injury Prevention: A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis

Marcos Quintana‐Cepedal, Omar de la Calle, Hugo Olmedillas, Beatriz Sánchez-Martínez et al.
2 citations
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
Sports injuries and prevention
3.44
article

The Copenhagen Adduction Exercise Effect on Sport Performance and Injury Prevention: A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis

Marcos Quintana‐Cepedal, Omar de la Calle, Hugo Olmedillas, Beatriz Sánchez-Martínez, Irene Crespo, Pedro Diez‐Solorzano
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The popularity of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise (CAE) has risen in recent years. This review aims to evaluate the available evidence on the isolated use of the CAE for both performance enhancement and injury prevention. This systematic review included prospective interventional studies investigating the effect of the CAE on strength and conditioning and injury prevention outcomes. 15 studies were included, comprising randomized controlled trials (n = 4), cluster-randomized controlled trials (n = 6), and pre-post trials (n = 5). These studies assessed adduction and abduction strength, jump and sprint performance, core endurance, dynamic balance, adductor longus muscle thickness, and the seasonal prevalence of groin injuries. Meta-analyses of within-group changes and between-group comparisons were performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and relative risk (RR). The implementation of the CAE yielded large effect sizes for adduction (within-group SMD = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.41 to 1.0; between-group SMD = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.18 to 1.7) and abduction (within-group SMD = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.47 to 1.4; between-group SMD = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.33 to 1.56) strength. Adduction strength adaptations were dependent on the repetitions performed (adherence-adjusted repetitions: p = 0.02; adherence-adjusted weekly repetitions: p = 0.0063). Dynamic balance can also be improved using the CAE (within-group SMD = 3.9). The CAE showed no statistically significant effect on seasonal groin injury prevalence (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.41 to 1.68). There were no additional benefits of the intervention for other performance metrics, and the quality of evidence underpinning all findings was rated as very low. The inclusion of the CAE can be recommended for adductor strength training, although current evidence does not support its use for reducing the risk of sustaining groin injuries. Registration Number: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CA7JW.

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in SportsVol. 35(8)
Universidad de Oviedo (ES), Australian Physiotherapy Association (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sports injuries and prevention
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.