Conventional and Contemporary Arabic Language Teaching Methods: A Comparative Analysis

This study compares conventional and contemporary Arabic language learning methods to analyze their effectiveness, assessment strategies, and integration in Indonesia's context of pesantren and madrasah. Using a literature review approach, this research examines conventional methods (grammar-translation, direct, audio-lingual) and contemporary methods (eclectic, communicative, technology-based). The findings reveal that conventional methods, dominant in pesantren, excel in building grammatical foundations and understanding classical texts but lack emphasis on practical communication skills. Conversely, contemporary methods, prevalent in madrasahs, enhance speaking and student engagement through technology and interactive activities, though they require robust infrastructure and teacher training. Assessment strategies range from written tests for conventional methods to project-based and online assessments for contemporary methods. An integrated model combining grammar-translation, communicative, and technology-based approaches is proposed to address diverse learner needs across beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alsina Journal of Arabic Studies
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21580/alsina.6.2.23307
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Arabic Language Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conventional and Contemporary Arabic Language Teaching Methods: A Comparative Analysis

Abdillah Mahbubi
1 citations
Alsina Journal of Arabic Studies
Arabic Language Education Studies
2.10
article

Conventional and Contemporary Arabic Language Teaching Methods: A Comparative Analysis

Abdillah Mahbubi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compares conventional and contemporary Arabic language learning methods to analyze their effectiveness, assessment strategies, and integration in Indonesia's context of pesantren and madrasah. Using a literature review approach, this research examines conventional methods (grammar-translation, direct, audio-lingual) and contemporary methods (eclectic, communicative, technology-based). The findings reveal that conventional methods, dominant in pesantren, excel in building grammatical foundations and understanding classical texts but lack emphasis on practical communication skills. Conversely, contemporary methods, prevalent in madrasahs, enhance speaking and student engagement through technology and interactive activities, though they require robust infrastructure and teacher training. Assessment strategies range from written tests for conventional methods to project-based and online assessments for contemporary methods. An integrated model combining grammar-translation, communicative, and technology-based approaches is proposed to address diverse learner needs across beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels.

Alsina Journal of Arabic StudiesVol. 6(2)
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Arabic Language Education Studies
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.