Experimental evidence of a consistent commensal relationship between avian hosts and feather mites of differing host specificities

ABSTRACT The majority of research on birds and their symbionts has focused on putatively parasitic relationships, but this presumption often lacks experimental evidence and overlooks the potential for context-dependent patterns. Nearly all studies regarding the impact of feather mites on their avian hosts have been correlative and spatially or taxonomically limited, resulting in conflicting and narrow classifications of the nature of the symbiosis (i.e., parasitic, mutualistic, or commensal). Furthermore, gaps in understanding mite host specificity, and thus an inability to account for this ecologically and evolutionarily important trait, may also contribute to these varying conclusions. Here, we examined the impacts of this trait by experimentally removing feather mites from 2 species of wild wood-warblers that harbor mites with different host specificities (one host specific, one found on ≥17 host species). Birds were recaptured the following year to assess potential for context-dependent impacts of mites on host body condition and apparent annual survival. Our treatment (mite removal) did not impact either metric and thus supports the neutral effect (commensalism) of feather mites on both Setophaga cerulea (Cerulean Warblers; host of the generalist mite, Amerodectes ischyros) and Protonotaria citrea (Prothonotary Warblers; host of the specialist mite, Amerodectes protonotaria). We found that mite abundances on S. cerulea, but not P. citrea, rebounded on hosts after 1 yr despite experimental manipulation, so it is unclear how long our treatment lasted. This population rebound also indicates the need to better understand the basic life history of feather mites (e.g., reproductive or transmission rate). This study provides some of the only experimental data on this perplexing symbiosis as well as a preliminary assessment of the importance of host specificity on the functional nature of this symbiotic relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Auk
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithology/ukaf037
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bird parasitology and diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental evidence of a consistent commensal relationship between avian hosts and feather mites of differing host specificities

Emily Donahue, Alix E. Matthews, Than J. Boves
1 citations
The Auk
Bird parasitology and diseases
2.05
article

Experimental evidence of a consistent commensal relationship between avian hosts and feather mites of differing host specificities

Emily Donahue, Alix E. Matthews, Than J. Boves
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The majority of research on birds and their symbionts has focused on putatively parasitic relationships, but this presumption often lacks experimental evidence and overlooks the potential for context-dependent patterns. Nearly all studies regarding the impact of feather mites on their avian hosts have been correlative and spatially or taxonomically limited, resulting in conflicting and narrow classifications of the nature of the symbiosis (i.e., parasitic, mutualistic, or commensal). Furthermore, gaps in understanding mite host specificity, and thus an inability to account for this ecologically and evolutionarily important trait, may also contribute to these varying conclusions. Here, we examined the impacts of this trait by experimentally removing feather mites from 2 species of wild wood-warblers that harbor mites with different host specificities (one host specific, one found on ≥17 host species). Birds were recaptured the following year to assess potential for context-dependent impacts of mites on host body condition and apparent annual survival. Our treatment (mite removal) did not impact either metric and thus supports the neutral effect (commensalism) of feather mites on both Setophaga cerulea (Cerulean Warblers; host of the generalist mite, Amerodectes ischyros) and Protonotaria citrea (Prothonotary Warblers; host of the specialist mite, Amerodectes protonotaria). We found that mite abundances on S. cerulea, but not P. citrea, rebounded on hosts after 1 yr despite experimental manipulation, so it is unclear how long our treatment lasted. This population rebound also indicates the need to better understand the basic life history of feather mites (e.g., reproductive or transmission rate). This study provides some of the only experimental data on this perplexing symbiosis as well as a preliminary assessment of the importance of host specificity on the functional nature of this symbiotic relationship.

The AukVol. 143(1)
Rhodes College (US), Arkansas State University (US), Arkansas Biosciences Institute (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Bird parasitology and diseases
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.