Refining the Concept of Earthquake Precursory Fingerprint

The recently proposed concept of “precursory fingerprint” is a logical consequence of the commonsense statement that seismic structures are unique and that their expected preshock behaviors, including precursory phenomena, are also unique. Our new prediction-related research strategy is conceptually based on the principles of (1) the uniqueness of seismogenic structures, (2) interconnected and interacting geospheres, and (3) non-equivalence of Earth’s surface spots in terms of precursory signal receptivity. The precursory fingerprint of a given seismic structure is a unique assemblage of precursory signals of various natures (seismic, physical, chemical, and biological), detectable in principle by using a system of proper monitoring equipment that consists of a matrix of n sensors placed on the ground at “sensitive” spots identified beforehand and on orbiting satellites. In principle, it is composed of a combination of signals that are emitted by the “responsive sensors”, in addition to the “non-responsive sensors”, coming from the sensor matrix, monitoring as many virtual precursory processes as possible by continuously measuring their relevant parameters. Each measured parameter has a pre-established (by experts) threshold value and an uncertainty interval, discriminating between background and anomalous values that are visualized similarly to traffic light signals (green, yellow, and red). The precursory fingerprint can thus be viewed as a particular configuration of “precursory signals” consisting of anomalous parameter values that are unique and characteristic to the targeted seismogenic structure. Presumably, it is a complex entity that consists of pattern, space, and time components. The “pattern component” is a particular arrangement of the responsive sensors on the master board of the monitoring system yielding anomalous parameter value signals, that can be re-arranged, after a series of experiments, in a spontaneously understandable new pattern. The “space component” is a map position configuration of the signal-detecting sensors, whereas the “time component” is a characteristic time sequence of the anomalous signals including the order, occurrence time before the event, transition time between yellow and red signals, etc. Artificial intelligence using pattern-recognition algorithms can be used to follow, evaluate, and validate the precursory signal assemblage and, finally, to judge, together with an expert board of human operators, its “precursory fingerprint” relevance. Signal interpretation limitations and uncertainties related to dependencies on sensor sensibility, focal depth, and magnitude can be established by completing all three phases (i.e., experimental, validation, and implementation) of the precursory fingerprint-based earthquake prediction research strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15080319
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refining the Concept of Earthquake Precursory Fingerprint

Alexandru Szakács
1 citations
Geosciences
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
1.87
article

Refining the Concept of Earthquake Precursory Fingerprint

Alexandru Szakács
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The recently proposed concept of “precursory fingerprint” is a logical consequence of the commonsense statement that seismic structures are unique and that their expected preshock behaviors, including precursory phenomena, are also unique. Our new prediction-related research strategy is conceptually based on the principles of (1) the uniqueness of seismogenic structures, (2) interconnected and interacting geospheres, and (3) non-equivalence of Earth’s surface spots in terms of precursory signal receptivity. The precursory fingerprint of a given seismic structure is a unique assemblage of precursory signals of various natures (seismic, physical, chemical, and biological), detectable in principle by using a system of proper monitoring equipment that consists of a matrix of n sensors placed on the ground at “sensitive” spots identified beforehand and on orbiting satellites. In principle, it is composed of a combination of signals that are emitted by the “responsive sensors”, in addition to the “non-responsive sensors”, coming from the sensor matrix, monitoring as many virtual precursory processes as possible by continuously measuring their relevant parameters. Each measured parameter has a pre-established (by experts) threshold value and an uncertainty interval, discriminating between background and anomalous values that are visualized similarly to traffic light signals (green, yellow, and red). The precursory fingerprint can thus be viewed as a particular configuration of “precursory signals” consisting of anomalous parameter values that are unique and characteristic to the targeted seismogenic structure. Presumably, it is a complex entity that consists of pattern, space, and time components. The “pattern component” is a particular arrangement of the responsive sensors on the master board of the monitoring system yielding anomalous parameter value signals, that can be re-arranged, after a series of experiments, in a spontaneously understandable new pattern. The “space component” is a map position configuration of the signal-detecting sensors, whereas the “time component” is a characteristic time sequence of the anomalous signals including the order, occurrence time before the event, transition time between yellow and red signals, etc. Artificial intelligence using pattern-recognition algorithms can be used to follow, evaluate, and validate the precursory signal assemblage and, finally, to judge, together with an expert board of human operators, its “precursory fingerprint” relevance. Signal interpretation limitations and uncertainties related to dependencies on sensor sensibility, focal depth, and magnitude can be established by completing all three phases (i.e., experimental, validation, and implementation) of the precursory fingerprint-based earthquake prediction research strategy.

GeosciencesVol. 15(8)
Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România (RO), Romanian Academy (RO), University of Sopron (HU)
Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.