Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness and Frequency of Complications in the Use of the "Flap Within a Flap" Technique and Traditional Techniques of Reconstruction with Skin Fascial Flaps of the Forearm

Reconstruction of large skin and soft tissue defects requires the use of reliable techniques that ensure optimal restoration of function and aesthetics. Compared to standard fasciocutaneous flaps, the “flap-in-flap” technique, which involves the creation of an additional movable segment inside the main flap, is attracting more and more attention. The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of traditional methods for closing large skin and soft tissue defects and the innovative “flap within a flap” technique. Data from 161 patients who underwent skin restoration using various methods were analyzed. The comparison group included traditional skin flaps, while the study group used a modified flap-within-a-flap technique. The flap survival rates, complication rates, rehabilitation time, and aesthetic results were assessed. The “flap-in-flap” technique showed the best results according to all evaluation criteria, which allows us to consider it as a promising alternative in reconstructive surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Science and Practice
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/117/36
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness and Frequency of Complications in the Use of the "Flap Within a Flap" Technique and Traditional Techniques of Reconstruction with Skin Fascial Flaps of the Forearm

A. Zhoroev, N. Temirov, S. Tukeshov
Bulletin of Science and Practice
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness and Frequency of Complications in the Use of the "Flap Within a Flap" Technique and Traditional Techniques of Reconstruction with Skin Fascial Flaps of the Forearm

A. Zhoroev, N. Temirov, S. Tukeshov
article en

Abstract

Reconstruction of large skin and soft tissue defects requires the use of reliable techniques that ensure optimal restoration of function and aesthetics. Compared to standard fasciocutaneous flaps, the “flap-in-flap” technique, which involves the creation of an additional movable segment inside the main flap, is attracting more and more attention. The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of traditional methods for closing large skin and soft tissue defects and the innovative “flap within a flap” technique. Data from 161 patients who underwent skin restoration using various methods were analyzed. The comparison group included traditional skin flaps, while the study group used a modified flap-within-a-flap technique. The flap survival rates, complication rates, rehabilitation time, and aesthetic results were assessed. The “flap-in-flap” technique showed the best results according to all evaluation criteria, which allows us to consider it as a promising alternative in reconstructive surgery.

Bulletin of Science and PracticeVol. 11(8)
Kyrgyz State Medical Academy (KG), Jalalabad State University (KG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness and Frequency of Complications in the Use of the "Flap Within a Flap" Technique and Traditional Techniques of Reconstruction with Skin Fascial Flaps of the Forearm — A. Zhoroev, N. Temirov, et al. · Bulletin of Science and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS