Minimally Invasive Surgical Technologies in the Treatment of Postoperative Peritonitis: Efficacy Analysis and Tactical Selection Criteria

Postoperative peritonitis remains one of the most severe complications in abdominal surgery, associated with high mortality rates (15–30%) and significant treatment costs. Despite advances in surgical techniques, its incidence persists at 1–5% following extensive abdominal operations. This study evaluates the efficacy of minimally invasive methods, particularly laparoscopy, in treating this complication and establishes criteria for selecting optimal surgical strategies. The study included 69 patients divided into two groups: a main group (n=46) undergoing laparoscopic interventions for diffuse peritonitis, and a control group (n=23) treated with traditional relaparotomy for localized forms. The results showed comparable timelines for repeat interventions (3.9 ± 2.9 days in the laparoscopic group vs. 4.1 ± 2.1 days in the relaparotomy group). However, nearly half of the repeat procedures (47.8%) in the laparoscopic group were performed within the first 48 hours, indicating earlier diagnosis of complications. Key criteria for selecting a laparoscopic approach were identified, including the absence of extensive fibrinous deposits, significant intestinal dilation, and the feasibility of a comprehensive abdominal cavity revision. Absolute indications for conversion to open surgery were also outlined, such as anastomotic leakage, intestinal perforation, mesenteric circulatory disorders, and severe inflammatory processes. Special emphasis was placed on laparoscopic abscess drainage techniques, including adhesiolysis and gravitational patient positioning to minimize the risk of infection spread. The study confirms that laparoscopy can be an effective alternative when strict patient selection criteria are applied. However, open surgery remains the preferred approach in complex cases. These findings hold significant practical value for surgeons, offering guidance for optimizing treatment strategies for postoperative peritonitis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Science and Practice
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/117/27
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimally Invasive Surgical Technologies in the Treatment of Postoperative Peritonitis: Efficacy Analysis and Tactical Selection Criteria

M.B. Chapyev
1 citations
Bulletin of Science and Practice
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
2.01
article

Minimally Invasive Surgical Technologies in the Treatment of Postoperative Peritonitis: Efficacy Analysis and Tactical Selection Criteria

M.B. Chapyev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Postoperative peritonitis remains one of the most severe complications in abdominal surgery, associated with high mortality rates (15–30%) and significant treatment costs. Despite advances in surgical techniques, its incidence persists at 1–5% following extensive abdominal operations. This study evaluates the efficacy of minimally invasive methods, particularly laparoscopy, in treating this complication and establishes criteria for selecting optimal surgical strategies. The study included 69 patients divided into two groups: a main group (n=46) undergoing laparoscopic interventions for diffuse peritonitis, and a control group (n=23) treated with traditional relaparotomy for localized forms. The results showed comparable timelines for repeat interventions (3.9 ± 2.9 days in the laparoscopic group vs. 4.1 ± 2.1 days in the relaparotomy group). However, nearly half of the repeat procedures (47.8%) in the laparoscopic group were performed within the first 48 hours, indicating earlier diagnosis of complications. Key criteria for selecting a laparoscopic approach were identified, including the absence of extensive fibrinous deposits, significant intestinal dilation, and the feasibility of a comprehensive abdominal cavity revision. Absolute indications for conversion to open surgery were also outlined, such as anastomotic leakage, intestinal perforation, mesenteric circulatory disorders, and severe inflammatory processes. Special emphasis was placed on laparoscopic abscess drainage techniques, including adhesiolysis and gravitational patient positioning to minimize the risk of infection spread. The study confirms that laparoscopy can be an effective alternative when strict patient selection criteria are applied. However, open surgery remains the preferred approach in complex cases. These findings hold significant practical value for surgeons, offering guidance for optimizing treatment strategies for postoperative peritonitis.

Bulletin of Science and PracticeVol. 11(8)
European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Technologies in the Treatment of Postoperative Peritonitis: Efficacy Analysis and Tactical Selection Criteria — M.B. Chapyev · Bulletin of Science and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS