The Last Thing on Your Mind: Recall Bias in EU Income Measurement

ABSTRACT This paper studies the soundness and consistency of income measurement in the EU‐SILC, the main household survey of the European Union. By comparing income data collected at different times of the year, I show that households exhibit strong recall bias when asked to report their income for the previous calendar year. In particular, retrospective valuations are skewed towards respondents' contemporaneous income at the time of the interview. Given large heterogeneity in data collection schedules, this present bias has serious consequences for the stability, reliability, and international comparability of income statistics across the EU. Microdata analysis from 2007 to 2021 shows that income self‐reports diverge by more than 10% across sampling quarters on average, which seriously distorts official statistics, income trends, and poverty estimates in several member states. These findings call for the harmonization of EU‐SILC data collection periods, more extensive use of registers, and a thorough review of related EU social statistics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Income and Wealth
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.70030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Last Thing on Your Mind: Recall Bias in EU Income Measurement

Balint Menyhert
1 citations
Review of Income and Wealth
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
3.13
article

The Last Thing on Your Mind: Recall Bias in EU Income Measurement

Balint Menyhert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper studies the soundness and consistency of income measurement in the EU‐SILC, the main household survey of the European Union. By comparing income data collected at different times of the year, I show that households exhibit strong recall bias when asked to report their income for the previous calendar year. In particular, retrospective valuations are skewed towards respondents' contemporaneous income at the time of the interview. Given large heterogeneity in data collection schedules, this present bias has serious consequences for the stability, reliability, and international comparability of income statistics across the EU. Microdata analysis from 2007 to 2021 shows that income self‐reports diverge by more than 10% across sampling quarters on average, which seriously distorts official statistics, income trends, and poverty estimates in several member states. These findings call for the harmonization of EU‐SILC data collection periods, more extensive use of registers, and a thorough review of related EU social statistics.

Review of Income and WealthVol. 71(3)
European Commission (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.