Displacement without Asylum: Structural and Legal Gaps in the Protection of Gazans under International Law

Research Objective: This study examines the protection of internally displaced Gazans under international law, focusing on the interaction between International Humanitarian Law, International Human Rights Law, and refugee law during the 2023 Israel–Hamas conflict. Research Methodology: Qualitative normative legal approach grounded in Human Rights Theory and Just War Theory, analyzing primary legal sources including the Geneva Conventions, the Rome Statute, and UN resolutions, with comparative cases from Syria, Ukraine, and Sudan. Results: Legal instruments provide substantial normative protections, but implementation is severely undermined by systematic violations. Both state and non-state actors frequently breach fundamental rights to life, health, shelter, and food, while international institutions face political and structural constraints limiting effectiveness. Findings and Implications: Despite extensive legal entitlements, displaced Gazans remain unprotected due to critical normative-practical discrepancies. The UN Security Council and International Court of Justice demonstrate institutional limitations, with global enforcement challenges being systemic rather than isolated. Conclusion: Without targeted legal reforms, structural institutional changes, and enhanced accountability mechanisms, displaced populations remain vulnerable despite comprehensive legal frameworks requiring fundamental transformation. Contribution: Identifies institutional failures in civilian protection and advocates for multidimensional reform, contributing to the understanding of normative-practical discrepancies in international humanitarian law. Limitations and Suggestions: Theoretical analytical methodology limits empirical validation, and the Gaza focus may restrict generalizability. Future research should incorporate field-based studies, expand comparative analysis, and examine institutional reform effectiveness longitudinally

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Al Daulah Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan
Published
2025-06-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v14i1.54003
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Displacement without Asylum: Structural and Legal Gaps in the Protection of Gazans under International Law

Maruf Adeniyi Nasir
Al Daulah Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Displacement without Asylum: Structural and Legal Gaps in the Protection of Gazans under International Law

Maruf Adeniyi Nasir
article en

Abstract

Research Objective: This study examines the protection of internally displaced Gazans under international law, focusing on the interaction between International Humanitarian Law, International Human Rights Law, and refugee law during the 2023 Israel–Hamas conflict. Research Methodology: Qualitative normative legal approach grounded in Human Rights Theory and Just War Theory, analyzing primary legal sources including the Geneva Conventions, the Rome Statute, and UN resolutions, with comparative cases from Syria, Ukraine, and Sudan. Results: Legal instruments provide substantial normative protections, but implementation is severely undermined by systematic violations. Both state and non-state actors frequently breach fundamental rights to life, health, shelter, and food, while international institutions face political and structural constraints limiting effectiveness. Findings and Implications: Despite extensive legal entitlements, displaced Gazans remain unprotected due to critical normative-practical discrepancies. The UN Security Council and International Court of Justice demonstrate institutional limitations, with global enforcement challenges being systemic rather than isolated. Conclusion: Without targeted legal reforms, structural institutional changes, and enhanced accountability mechanisms, displaced populations remain vulnerable despite comprehensive legal frameworks requiring fundamental transformation. Contribution: Identifies institutional failures in civilian protection and advocates for multidimensional reform, contributing to the understanding of normative-practical discrepancies in international humanitarian law. Limitations and Suggestions: Theoretical analytical methodology limits empirical validation, and the Gaza focus may restrict generalizability. Future research should incorporate field-based studies, expand comparative analysis, and examine institutional reform effectiveness longitudinally

Al Daulah Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan KetatanegaraanVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Displacement without Asylum: Structural and Legal Gaps in the Protection of Gazans under International Law — Maruf Adeniyi Nasir · Al Daulah Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS