Linking Strengths‐Based Supervisor Feedback to Job Crafting: The Moderating Role of Self‐Efficacy

ABSTRACT Strengths‐based supervisor feedback focuses on identifying, appreciating, and utilizing employees' unique qualities at work. Building on Job Demands‐Resources (JD‐R) theory, we hypothesize that strengths‐based supervisor feedback is positively related to employee job crafting through employee work engagement. Moreover, we challenge the idea that strengths‐based supervisor feedback is equally beneficial to all employees, introducing employees' personal resources (self‐efficacy) as a boundary condition. The results of a time‐separated study using reports from 244 employees showed that T1 strengths‐based supervisor feedback was positively related to T3 employee job crafting through T2 work engagement. Moreover, results demonstrated that receiving strengths‐based supervisor feedback was especially important for employees low (vs. high) in self‐efficacy. For employees who already strongly believed in their abilities to successfully perform their work tasks (i.e., who had high levels of self‐efficacy), strengths‐based supervisor feedback did not contribute to their work engagement and job crafting. The indirect effect between strengths‐based supervisor feedback and job crafting via work engagement was replicated in a second time‐separated survey study among 280 employees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.70020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking Strengths‐Based Supervisor Feedback to Job Crafting: The Moderating Role of Self‐Efficacy

Arnold B. Bakker, Adelien Decramer, Evangelia Demerouti, Mieke Audenaert et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
article

Linking Strengths‐Based Supervisor Feedback to Job Crafting: The Moderating Role of Self‐Efficacy

Arnold B. Bakker, Adelien Decramer, Evangelia Demerouti, Mieke Audenaert, Isabeau Van Strydonck, Vincent Goossens
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Strengths‐based supervisor feedback focuses on identifying, appreciating, and utilizing employees' unique qualities at work. Building on Job Demands‐Resources (JD‐R) theory, we hypothesize that strengths‐based supervisor feedback is positively related to employee job crafting through employee work engagement. Moreover, we challenge the idea that strengths‐based supervisor feedback is equally beneficial to all employees, introducing employees' personal resources (self‐efficacy) as a boundary condition. The results of a time‐separated study using reports from 244 employees showed that T1 strengths‐based supervisor feedback was positively related to T3 employee job crafting through T2 work engagement. Moreover, results demonstrated that receiving strengths‐based supervisor feedback was especially important for employees low (vs. high) in self‐efficacy. For employees who already strongly believed in their abilities to successfully perform their work tasks (i.e., who had high levels of self‐efficacy), strengths‐based supervisor feedback did not contribute to their work engagement and job crafting. The indirect effect between strengths‐based supervisor feedback and job crafting via work engagement was replicated in a second time‐separated survey study among 280 employees.

International Journal of Selection and AssessmentVol. 33(3)
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Ghent University (BE), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.