Systematic Review of Assessment Tools for Factors Influencing Missed Nursing Care Among Nurses Based on COSMIN Guidelines

Background: Due to various reasons, the phenomenon of missed nursing care is widespread, which directly leads to the occurrence of adverse nursing events. At present, a variety of measurement tools have been developed worldwide to assess the influencing factors of clinical nurses’ missed nursing care. However, there is no comprehensive standard evaluation of the performance of such measurement tools and the methodological quality of the research. Aim: A systematic review of the methodological quality and measurement properties of the scale for influencing factors of missed nursing care was conducted to provide evidence-based guidance for nursing managers in selecting high-quality assessment tools. Methods: To systematically retrieve literature on assessment tools for clinical nurses’ missed nursing care from Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Database, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) from inception to July 1, 2024. Two researchers independently screened and extracted the data. The assessment tools were evaluated in terms of measurement properties and methodological quality based on the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN), ultimately leading to the formulation of recommendations. Results: A total of 12 studies included 12 assessment tools for evaluating factors influencing missed nursing care among clinical nurses. Since the content validity was “indeterminate” for all, there were no A-grade recommended tools. Nine assessment tools were recommended as B-grade, and three as C-grade. Conclusion: The methodological and measurement properties of assessment tools for missed nursing care need to be further improved. In comparison, the missed intensive nursing care scale (MINCS) has a relatively comprehensive report on measurement properties, with high-quality evidence demonstrating that its measurement properties of structural validity, internal consistency, and stability are “adequate”. It can be temporarily recommended as an assessment tool for influencing factors of missed nursing care in the intensive care unit. However, the reporting of its measurement properties still needs further refinement. Keywords: clinical nurses, missed nursing care, assessment tools, COSMIN, measurement properties, systematic review

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Research and Reviews
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/nrr.s523366
Primary Topic
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Review of Assessment Tools for Factors Influencing Missed Nursing Care Among Nurses Based on COSMIN Guidelines

Lijuan Li, Yunhong Zhang, Xuelin Wang, Xiang Li
Nursing Research and Reviews
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
article

Systematic Review of Assessment Tools for Factors Influencing Missed Nursing Care Among Nurses Based on COSMIN Guidelines

Lijuan Li, Yunhong Zhang, Xuelin Wang, Xiang Li
article en

Abstract

Background: Due to various reasons, the phenomenon of missed nursing care is widespread, which directly leads to the occurrence of adverse nursing events. At present, a variety of measurement tools have been developed worldwide to assess the influencing factors of clinical nurses’ missed nursing care. However, there is no comprehensive standard evaluation of the performance of such measurement tools and the methodological quality of the research. Aim: A systematic review of the methodological quality and measurement properties of the scale for influencing factors of missed nursing care was conducted to provide evidence-based guidance for nursing managers in selecting high-quality assessment tools. Methods: To systematically retrieve literature on assessment tools for clinical nurses’ missed nursing care from Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Database, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) from inception to July 1, 2024. Two researchers independently screened and extracted the data. The assessment tools were evaluated in terms of measurement properties and methodological quality based on the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN), ultimately leading to the formulation of recommendations. Results: A total of 12 studies included 12 assessment tools for evaluating factors influencing missed nursing care among clinical nurses. Since the content validity was “indeterminate” for all, there were no A-grade recommended tools. Nine assessment tools were recommended as B-grade, and three as C-grade. Conclusion: The methodological and measurement properties of assessment tools for missed nursing care need to be further improved. In comparison, the missed intensive nursing care scale (MINCS) has a relatively comprehensive report on measurement properties, with high-quality evidence demonstrating that its measurement properties of structural validity, internal consistency, and stability are “adequate”. It can be temporarily recommended as an assessment tool for influencing factors of missed nursing care in the intensive care unit. However, the reporting of its measurement properties still needs further refinement. Keywords: clinical nurses, missed nursing care, assessment tools, COSMIN, measurement properties, systematic review

Nursing Research and ReviewsVol. Volume 15
Dali University (CN)
Dali University
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.