David Harvey’s Value Theory: A Critique of Marxism as Political Economy

Abstract This article critically assesses David Harvey’s work in relation to Marx’s critique of political economy. Drawing upon and contributing to recent development of Marx’s critique of political economy as a critical social theory, I argue fundamental problems emerge with the way Harvey conceives of economic categories such as value, money, and capital. This is because he continues to read Marx’s work as radical political economy rather than its critique. Significant theoretical and political consequences follow. Harvey’s standpoint remains traditional, affirming both labour and the labourer in opposition to capital. This presents a theory that, while ostensibly dedicated to combatting capitalist social domination, nevertheless affirms rather than negates the essential moment of that domination. On these grounds, Harvey’s theory of financialisation presents a truncated critique of capital, one-sidedly fixated on abolishing certain forms of its appearance while leaving others intact.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Historical Materialism
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206x-bja10086
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

David Harvey’s Value Theory: A Critique of Marxism as Political Economy

Benjamin Tetler
Historical Materialism
Political Economy and Marxism
article

David Harvey’s Value Theory: A Critique of Marxism as Political Economy

Benjamin Tetler
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article critically assesses David Harvey’s work in relation to Marx’s critique of political economy. Drawing upon and contributing to recent development of Marx’s critique of political economy as a critical social theory, I argue fundamental problems emerge with the way Harvey conceives of economic categories such as value, money, and capital. This is because he continues to read Marx’s work as radical political economy rather than its critique. Significant theoretical and political consequences follow. Harvey’s standpoint remains traditional, affirming both labour and the labourer in opposition to capital. This presents a theory that, while ostensibly dedicated to combatting capitalist social domination, nevertheless affirms rather than negates the essential moment of that domination. On these grounds, Harvey’s theory of financialisation presents a truncated critique of capital, one-sidedly fixated on abolishing certain forms of its appearance while leaving others intact.

Historical MaterialismVol. 33(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.