Examining factors perceived to enable and deter student reports of hazing

<b>Objective</b>: This investigation employed qualitative methods to examine factors perceived to enable or deter student reports of hazing. <b>Participants:</b> Data were collected from campus staff members (<i>n</i> = 100) and students (<i>n</i> = 64) at six universities participating in the Hazing Prevention Consortium through IRB-approved interviews and focus groups. <b>Methods:</b> The authors utilized an interpretive qualitative approach to answer the research questions. Two rounds of inductive coding were completed, and themes were constructed around salient codes. <b>Findings:</b> Analysis illuminated that student emphasis on relationships and connections, student conceptualizations of hazing, and student understanding of their institutional contexts were factors weighed before deciding to disclose an incident of hazing. <b>Conclusion:</b> Findings contribute new knowledge and add to the literature about hazing prevention and contextualize student reporting practices. Recommendations for research and practice are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of American College Health
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2025.2547797
Primary Topic
Art Therapy and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining factors perceived to enable and deter student reports of hazing

Douglas R. Franklin, Elizabeth J. Allan
Journal of American College Health
Art Therapy and Mental Health
article

Examining factors perceived to enable and deter student reports of hazing

Douglas R. Franklin, Elizabeth J. Allan
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: This investigation employed qualitative methods to examine factors perceived to enable or deter student reports of hazing. <b>Participants:</b> Data were collected from campus staff members (<i>n</i> = 100) and students (<i>n</i> = 64) at six universities participating in the Hazing Prevention Consortium through IRB-approved interviews and focus groups. <b>Methods:</b> The authors utilized an interpretive qualitative approach to answer the research questions. Two rounds of inductive coding were completed, and themes were constructed around salient codes. <b>Findings:</b> Analysis illuminated that student emphasis on relationships and connections, student conceptualizations of hazing, and student understanding of their institutional contexts were factors weighed before deciding to disclose an incident of hazing. <b>Conclusion:</b> Findings contribute new knowledge and add to the literature about hazing prevention and contextualize student reporting practices. Recommendations for research and practice are provided.

Journal of American College Health
University of Maine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Art Therapy and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.