Occasionalism and the Problem of Impenetrability

Abstract In the European tradition, occasionalism is strongly associated with Cartesianism. One potent challenge to Cartesian occasionalism, raised in the 17th century by Bernard de Fontenelle, goes like this: Cartesian corporeal ontology is inconsistent with occasionalism in the corporeal domain because impenetrability is conceptually derived from the material essence and a causal power. This paper, therefore, poses the question: Did Fontenelle show that Cartesians cannot be occasionalist? It also answers this question in the negative by arguing that Descartes's writings on impenetrability show that he does not understand impenetrability to be a causal power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Philosophy Quarterly
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5406/21521026.42.2.03
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occasionalism and the Problem of Impenetrability

Travis Tanner
History of Philosophy Quarterly
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

Occasionalism and the Problem of Impenetrability

Travis Tanner
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the European tradition, occasionalism is strongly associated with Cartesianism. One potent challenge to Cartesian occasionalism, raised in the 17th century by Bernard de Fontenelle, goes like this: Cartesian corporeal ontology is inconsistent with occasionalism in the corporeal domain because impenetrability is conceptually derived from the material essence and a causal power. This paper, therefore, poses the question: Did Fontenelle show that Cartesians cannot be occasionalist? It also answers this question in the negative by arguing that Descartes's writings on impenetrability show that he does not understand impenetrability to be a causal power.

History of Philosophy QuarterlyVol. 42(2)
Austin Peay State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.