Surface core flow dynamic pressure estimation

SUMMARY The flows within Earth’s fluid outer core push and pull on the core–mantle boundary (CMB) through dynamic pressure variations, potentially leading to deformation of the CMB. It is therefore crucial to obtain a realistic estimate of the pressure associated with flows within the fluid core. In many studies, it is commonly assumed that the flow tangent to the CMB is in balance between Coriolis and pressure gradient forces, known as a tangentially geostrophic (TG) flow. A static pressure field is thereby associated kinematically to the flow field at the core’s surface. We run direct numeric simulations of the magnetohydrodynamic equations in the Boussinesq approximation that can solve for the pressure field and allow for a comparison between a fully dynamic solution and the TG pressure estimate. An excellent agreement between the two pressure fields is found for a steady image of the core surface dynamics. However, the performance of the TG pressure estimate is not without limitations. Although it effectively captures most of the temporal dynamics associated with the fluid flow, discrepancies arise, particularly near the equator and for rapid changes in flow dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Journal International
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf321
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flow Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface core flow dynamic pressure estimation

Mioara Mandéa, Felix Gerick
1 citations
Geophysical Journal International
Flow Measurement and Analysis
0.86
article

Surface core flow dynamic pressure estimation

Mioara Mandéa, Felix Gerick
article en
1 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY The flows within Earth’s fluid outer core push and pull on the core–mantle boundary (CMB) through dynamic pressure variations, potentially leading to deformation of the CMB. It is therefore crucial to obtain a realistic estimate of the pressure associated with flows within the fluid core. In many studies, it is commonly assumed that the flow tangent to the CMB is in balance between Coriolis and pressure gradient forces, known as a tangentially geostrophic (TG) flow. A static pressure field is thereby associated kinematically to the flow field at the core’s surface. We run direct numeric simulations of the magnetohydrodynamic equations in the Boussinesq approximation that can solve for the pressure field and allow for a comparison between a fully dynamic solution and the TG pressure estimate. An excellent agreement between the two pressure fields is found for a steady image of the core surface dynamics. However, the performance of the TG pressure estimate is not without limitations. Although it effectively captures most of the temporal dynamics associated with the fluid flow, discrepancies arise, particularly near the equator and for rapid changes in flow dynamics.

Geophysical Journal InternationalVol. 243(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut de physique du globe de Paris (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Centre National d'Études Spatiales (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Flow Measurement and Analysis
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Surface core flow dynamic pressure estimation — Mioara Mandéa, Felix Gerick · Geophysical Journal International (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS