Abduct, Deduct, Induct, Respawn! A Retroductive Perspective on Games

Games are more than systems to master; they are engines of iterative thought. Through play, users engage in a retroductive loop: an unexpected event triggers hypothesis formation (abduction), leading to action planning and execution (deduction) and learning from feedback (induction). While it is central to player experience, current game AI typically optimizes for challenge balancing or content generation, rarely reflecting back on the player's evolving mental model. We propose treating both the player and the game as coupled retroductive agents that continuously observe, hypothesize, act, and learn across nested timescales. We formalize the retroductive processes of each agent and model their co-evolutionary dialogue as an exchange of inferences and feedback, positioning the game not as a reactive system but as a thinking partner. Building on this formalism, we articulate the vision of retroductive play: Gameplay as an epistemic negotiation in which the system deliberately probes, challenges, and reshapes the player's mental model while refining its own, judging progress by shifts in understanding rather than optimized performance. Retroductive play invites players-and the game that serves them-to respawn their ways of thinking.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cog64752.2025.11114395
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abduct, Deduct, Induct, Respawn! A Retroductive Perspective on Games

Sebastian von Mammen, Anne Vetter
Game Theory and Applications
article

Abduct, Deduct, Induct, Respawn! A Retroductive Perspective on Games

Sebastian von Mammen, Anne Vetter
article en

Abstract

Games are more than systems to master; they are engines of iterative thought. Through play, users engage in a retroductive loop: an unexpected event triggers hypothesis formation (abduction), leading to action planning and execution (deduction) and learning from feedback (induction). While it is central to player experience, current game AI typically optimizes for challenge balancing or content generation, rarely reflecting back on the player's evolving mental model. We propose treating both the player and the game as coupled retroductive agents that continuously observe, hypothesize, act, and learn across nested timescales. We formalize the retroductive processes of each agent and model their co-evolutionary dialogue as an exchange of inferences and feedback, positioning the game not as a reactive system but as a thinking partner. Building on this formalism, we articulate the vision of retroductive play: Gameplay as an epistemic negotiation in which the system deliberately probes, challenges, and reshapes the player's mental model while refining its own, judging progress by shifts in understanding rather than optimized performance. Retroductive play invites players-and the game that serves them-to respawn their ways of thinking.

Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Game Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.