A Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Equipment Failures in Industrial Maintenance

A significant financial commitment is needed for the upkeep and replacement of highway equipment, and a thorough inspection of every piece of equipment is quite costly. This article aims to trace the development of research and the advancements achieved in using AI/ML approaches for equipment malfunction prediction. To forecast industrial maintenance equipment failures on the AI4I 2020 Predictive Maintenance Dataset, this research compares the accuracy of three ML models: GB, MLP, and KNN. Each model’s performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. With a $90 \%$ accuracy rate, $92 \%$ precision, $90 \%$ recall, and an F1-score of $85.69 \%$, the Gradient Boosting model clearly excels at detecting true positives and striking a good balance between recall and precision. The result shows that the GB model accurately predicts failure prediction. Future work will focus on further enhancing model performance by exploring advanced feature engineering techniques, incorporating additional data sources, and experimenting with other machine learning algorithms to improve precision-recall balance and overall predictive accuracy.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mpseciceta64837.2025.11118330
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Equipment Failures in Industrial Maintenance

Hiranmaye Sarpana Chandu
1 citations
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
0.86
article

A Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Equipment Failures in Industrial Maintenance

Hiranmaye Sarpana Chandu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A significant financial commitment is needed for the upkeep and replacement of highway equipment, and a thorough inspection of every piece of equipment is quite costly. This article aims to trace the development of research and the advancements achieved in using AI/ML approaches for equipment malfunction prediction. To forecast industrial maintenance equipment failures on the AI4I 2020 Predictive Maintenance Dataset, this research compares the accuracy of three ML models: GB, MLP, and KNN. Each model’s performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. With a $90 \%$ accuracy rate, $92 \%$ precision, $90 \%$ recall, and an F1-score of $85.69 \%$, the Gradient Boosting model clearly excels at detecting true positives and striking a good balance between recall and precision. The result shows that the GB model accurately predicts failure prediction. Future work will focus on further enhancing model performance by exploring advanced feature engineering techniques, incorporating additional data sources, and experimenting with other machine learning algorithms to improve precision-recall balance and overall predictive accuracy.

Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.