Underfill Inspection and Testing in Surface Mount Technology: A Review of Diagnostic and Analytic Methods

The underfill process is essential for the reliability of flip-chip and electronic assemblies, particularly for BGA and CSP components on printed circuit boards (PCBs). Quality control and defect diagnosis pose significant challenges due to the complexity of these assemblies and the diversity of materials used. This study systematically evaluates seven methods for assessing underfill at the board level, analyzing their applicability, advantages, and disadvantages. It emphasizes both qualitative and quantitative approaches to verify underfill effects and assess chemical compatibility among materials. The findings indicate that no single method is universally suitable for underfill assessment; instead, a combination of techniques is recommended based on specific inspection requirements, production stages, and available resources. The limitations of each method highlight the need for further research and the development of non-destructive techniques for a comprehensive evaluation of underfill quality. Ultimately, these insights can aid in selecting appropriate methods for underfill control throughout various application phases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isse65583.2025.11120978
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underfill Inspection and Testing in Surface Mount Technology: A Review of Diagnostic and Analytic Methods

Attila Géczy, Ivana Beshajová Pelikánová, Zbyněk Plachý, Karel Dušek
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

Underfill Inspection and Testing in Surface Mount Technology: A Review of Diagnostic and Analytic Methods

Attila Géczy, Ivana Beshajová Pelikánová, Zbyněk Plachý, Karel Dušek
article en

Abstract

The underfill process is essential for the reliability of flip-chip and electronic assemblies, particularly for BGA and CSP components on printed circuit boards (PCBs). Quality control and defect diagnosis pose significant challenges due to the complexity of these assemblies and the diversity of materials used. This study systematically evaluates seven methods for assessing underfill at the board level, analyzing their applicability, advantages, and disadvantages. It emphasizes both qualitative and quantitative approaches to verify underfill effects and assess chemical compatibility among materials. The findings indicate that no single method is universally suitable for underfill assessment; instead, a combination of techniques is recommended based on specific inspection requirements, production stages, and available resources. The limitations of each method highlight the need for further research and the development of non-destructive techniques for a comprehensive evaluation of underfill quality. Ultimately, these insights can aid in selecting appropriate methods for underfill control throughout various application phases.

Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.