Comparison of SAW and MABAC Methods in Determining Strategic Tourism Destinations with Entropy Weighting Integration

Bima Regency, with its natural and cultural diversity, has great potential as a strategic tourism destination that requires proper management. However, the main challenge faced is determining the most potential destinations appropriately and supported by accurate data. In an effort to address the problem, this research utilizes the Entropy method for criteria weighting and applies two multi-criteria decisionmaking methods, Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and MultiAttributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC), to evaluate their effectiveness in selecting tourist destinations in Bima Regency. The results show that both methods consistently identify Lariti Beach as a superior destination. From the comparison of the two methods, the SAW method provides more stable and consistent results, is suitable for less complex conditions, and requires long-term reliability. Meanwhile, the MABAC method shows higher sensitivity to data changes, with more significant fluctuations in results. Thus, the SAW method is considered more appropriate for use in the selection of strategic tourist destinations in Bima Regency, considering that this method provides consistent results as well as efficiency and ease of application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/incitest64888.2024.11121470
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of SAW and MABAC Methods in Determining Strategic Tourism Destinations with Entropy Weighting Integration

Yeffry Handoko Putra, Muhlas Adiputra
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Comparison of SAW and MABAC Methods in Determining Strategic Tourism Destinations with Entropy Weighting Integration

Yeffry Handoko Putra, Muhlas Adiputra
article en

Abstract

Bima Regency, with its natural and cultural diversity, has great potential as a strategic tourism destination that requires proper management. However, the main challenge faced is determining the most potential destinations appropriately and supported by accurate data. In an effort to address the problem, this research utilizes the Entropy method for criteria weighting and applies two multi-criteria decisionmaking methods, Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and MultiAttributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC), to evaluate their effectiveness in selecting tourist destinations in Bima Regency. The results show that both methods consistently identify Lariti Beach as a superior destination. From the comparison of the two methods, the SAW method provides more stable and consistent results, is suitable for less complex conditions, and requires long-term reliability. Meanwhile, the MABAC method shows higher sensitivity to data changes, with more significant fluctuations in results. Thus, the SAW method is considered more appropriate for use in the selection of strategic tourist destinations in Bima Regency, considering that this method provides consistent results as well as efficiency and ease of application.

Universitas Komputer Indonesia (ID)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.