Recoater blade selection framework for AM processes utilizing powder

Powder recoating is a critical aspect of powder-based Additive Manufacturing (AM) techniques. The creation of a uniform powder layer is a top priority due to the dependence of the mechanical and microstructural properties of the specimen. Several recoaters, including blade and roller, are reported in the literature to distribute and level uniform powder layers to fulfill the layerwise AM approach. However, the literature fails to report a framework for selecting the optimal blade recoater. This study proposes a framework based on four parameters: deep-dipping approach, layer thickness, recoating time, and powder wastage. The authors tailored the deep-dipping approach from the Stereolithography (SLA) AM process and applied it to the powder-based AM processes. The framework is applied to seven-blade recoater combinations based on the blade count (one or two) and directionality (unidirectional or bidirectional). The analytical and experimental study resulted in the selection of the dual-blade bidirectional recoater. The selected recoater fulfilled the deep-dipping approach and achieved the required layer thickness (ta=tr) in minimum recoating time (T = Tmin) and powder wastage (Vw=2 V). Subsequently, the selected recoater is physically realized with a proof-of-concept (POC) followed by full-scale model installation in a self-developed laser-powder bed fusion (L-PBF) apparatus. The experimental study resulted in the production of a uniform sand layer and multiple specimens. The analysis revealed that the deviation in average specimen dimension along the build direction was < 3.23%, i.e., 51.41 mm, against the actual 49.8 mm. Thus, the results demonstrate the capability of the blade recoater selected via the proposed framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Mechanical Engineering
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44245-025-00118-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recoater blade selection framework for AM processes utilizing powder

Avinash Kumar Mehta, Yash Gopal Mittal, Yogesh Patil, Gopal Gote et al.
1 citations
Discover Mechanical Engineering
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
article

Recoater blade selection framework for AM processes utilizing powder

Avinash Kumar Mehta, Yash Gopal Mittal, Yogesh Patil, Gopal Gote, K. P. Karunakaran
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Powder recoating is a critical aspect of powder-based Additive Manufacturing (AM) techniques. The creation of a uniform powder layer is a top priority due to the dependence of the mechanical and microstructural properties of the specimen. Several recoaters, including blade and roller, are reported in the literature to distribute and level uniform powder layers to fulfill the layerwise AM approach. However, the literature fails to report a framework for selecting the optimal blade recoater. This study proposes a framework based on four parameters: deep-dipping approach, layer thickness, recoating time, and powder wastage. The authors tailored the deep-dipping approach from the Stereolithography (SLA) AM process and applied it to the powder-based AM processes. The framework is applied to seven-blade recoater combinations based on the blade count (one or two) and directionality (unidirectional or bidirectional). The analytical and experimental study resulted in the selection of the dual-blade bidirectional recoater. The selected recoater fulfilled the deep-dipping approach and achieved the required layer thickness (ta=tr) in minimum recoating time (T = Tmin) and powder wastage (Vw=2 V). Subsequently, the selected recoater is physically realized with a proof-of-concept (POC) followed by full-scale model installation in a self-developed laser-powder bed fusion (L-PBF) apparatus. The experimental study resulted in the production of a uniform sand layer and multiple specimens. The analysis revealed that the deviation in average specimen dimension along the build direction was < 3.23%, i.e., 51.41 mm, against the actual 49.8 mm. Thus, the results demonstrate the capability of the blade recoater selected via the proposed framework.

Discover Mechanical EngineeringVol. 4(1)
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN), Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (IN), Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.