Study on Stress Testing and the Evaluation of Flood Resilience in Mountain Communities

The increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events pose significant challenges to mountain communities, particularly in terms of flash flood risks. This study presents a framework for stress testing and evaluating flood resilience in mountain communities through the integration of high-resolution InfoWorks ICM two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling and systematic resilience assessment. The framework makes three key innovations: (1) multi-scale temporal stress scenarios combining short-duration extreme events (1–2 h) with long-duration persistent events (24 h) and historical extremes; (2) integrated infrastructure–drainage stress analysis that explicitly models roads’ dual role as critical infrastructure and emergency drainage channels; and (3) dynamic resilience quantification under multiple stressors across 15 systematically designed stress conditions. Using Western Beijing as a case study, the model is validated, achieving Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values exceeding 0.9, demonstrating its robust capability in simulating complex mountainous terrain flood processes. Through systematic analysis of fifteen rainfall scenarios designed based on Chicago rainfall patterns and historical events (including the July 2023 Haihe River basin flood), encompassing various intensities (30–200 mm/h), durations (1 h, 2 h, 24 h), and return periods (10, 50, 100 years), the key findings include the following: (1) A rainfall intensity of 60 mm/h represents a crucial threshold for system performance, beyond which significant impacts on community infrastructure emerge, with built-up areas experiencing inundation depths of 0.27–0.4 m that exceed safe passage limits. (2) Road networks become primary drainage channels during intense precipitation, with velocities exceeding 5 m/s in village roads and exceeding 5 m/s in country road sections, creating significant hazard potential. (3) Four major risk spots were identified with distinct waterlogging patterns, characterized by maximum depths ranging from 0.8 to 2.0 m and recovery periods varying from 2 to 12 hours depending on the topographic confluence effects and drainage efficiency. (4) The system demonstrates strong recovery capability, achieving >90% recovery within 3–6 hours for short-duration events, while showing vulnerability to extreme scenarios, with performance declining to 0.75–0.80, highlighting the coupling effects between water depth and flow velocity in steep terrain. This research provides quantitative insights for flood risk management and for enhancing community resilience in mountainous regions, offering valuable guidance for infrastructure improvement, emergency response optimization, and sustainable community development. This study primarily focuses on physical resilience aspects, with socioeconomic and institutional dimensions representing important directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167463
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on Stress Testing and the Evaluation of Flood Resilience in Mountain Communities

Ai‐Zhi Wu, Mingjun Yin, Xiaoxiao Sun, Yingchun Tao et al.
Sustainability
Regional Development and Environment
article

Study on Stress Testing and the Evaluation of Flood Resilience in Mountain Communities

Ai‐Zhi Wu, Mingjun Yin, Xiaoxiao Sun, Yingchun Tao, Fucai Yu, Hong Huang
article en

Abstract

The increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events pose significant challenges to mountain communities, particularly in terms of flash flood risks. This study presents a framework for stress testing and evaluating flood resilience in mountain communities through the integration of high-resolution InfoWorks ICM two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling and systematic resilience assessment. The framework makes three key innovations: (1) multi-scale temporal stress scenarios combining short-duration extreme events (1–2 h) with long-duration persistent events (24 h) and historical extremes; (2) integrated infrastructure–drainage stress analysis that explicitly models roads’ dual role as critical infrastructure and emergency drainage channels; and (3) dynamic resilience quantification under multiple stressors across 15 systematically designed stress conditions. Using Western Beijing as a case study, the model is validated, achieving Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values exceeding 0.9, demonstrating its robust capability in simulating complex mountainous terrain flood processes. Through systematic analysis of fifteen rainfall scenarios designed based on Chicago rainfall patterns and historical events (including the July 2023 Haihe River basin flood), encompassing various intensities (30–200 mm/h), durations (1 h, 2 h, 24 h), and return periods (10, 50, 100 years), the key findings include the following: (1) A rainfall intensity of 60 mm/h represents a crucial threshold for system performance, beyond which significant impacts on community infrastructure emerge, with built-up areas experiencing inundation depths of 0.27–0.4 m that exceed safe passage limits. (2) Road networks become primary drainage channels during intense precipitation, with velocities exceeding 5 m/s in village roads and exceeding 5 m/s in country road sections, creating significant hazard potential. (3) Four major risk spots were identified with distinct waterlogging patterns, characterized by maximum depths ranging from 0.8 to 2.0 m and recovery periods varying from 2 to 12 hours depending on the topographic confluence effects and drainage efficiency. (4) The system demonstrates strong recovery capability, achieving >90% recovery within 3–6 hours for short-duration events, while showing vulnerability to extreme scenarios, with performance declining to 0.75–0.80, highlighting the coupling effects between water depth and flow velocity in steep terrain. This research provides quantitative insights for flood risk management and for enhancing community resilience in mountainous regions, offering valuable guidance for infrastructure improvement, emergency response optimization, and sustainable community development. This study primarily focuses on physical resilience aspects, with socioeconomic and institutional dimensions representing important directions for future research.

SustainabilityVol. 17(16)
Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping (CN), Beijing Academy of Science and Technology (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Regional Development and Environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.