697. EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL OF GUT TASTE RECEPTORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISORDERED EATING BEHAVIOUR

Abstract Background Individuals who suffer from disordered overeating often experience dysregulated food reward. As such, investigation of the mechanisms underlying food reward can contribute to our understanding of disordered eating behaviours. Emerging evidence highlights the role of post-ingestive gut–brain signalling in reinforcing food-related reward. The sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) expressed in the small intestine is the receptor that is thought to initiate gut-brain signalling of sugar reward. Phlorizin, a naturally occurring SGLT1 inhibitor, offers a pharmacological tool to investigate gut-mediated reinforcement. Aims & Objectives This study aimed to investigate 1) whether pharmacological inhibition of intestinal SGLT1 with phlorizin can reduce intra-gastrically delivered glucose reinforcement in mice; 2) patterns of brain activation induced by oral versus post-ingestive glucose. Method Adult male C57BL/6J mice self-administered either oral or intra-gastric 8% glucose, under fixed and progressive ratio schedules. A subset of mice received either 0.04% phlorizin v/v in 5% DMSO v/v vehicle, or vehicle alone, via intragastric infusion paired to oral glucose delivery. Brains were subsequently processed for c-Fos immunostaining to identify neuronal activation in brain regions relating to taste and reward. Results Mice operantly responded for both oral and intra-gastric glucose, demonstrating that gut delivery of glucose is reinforcing. Despite this, analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between phlorizin and vehicle groups (p > 0.05) in mice self-administering intra-gastric glucose. Subsequent immunohistochemistry analysis revealed distinct activation patterns associated with oral and post-ingestive glucose. Oral glucose was associated with higher c-fos expression in the rostral nucleus solitary tract, nucleus accumbens, and granular insular cortex (p < 0.05) whereas intragastric glucose was associated with higher c-fos expression in the caudal nucleus solitary tract and lateral parabrachial nucleus (p < 0.05). Discussion & Conclusions Collectively, these findings show that intestinal SGLT1 inhibition at the concentration tested does not impact gut-mediated glucose reward, suggesting a non-SGLT1 mediated mechanism. Further, fos expression data suggests that oral glucose rewards may be predominantly processed in mesolimbic regions and taste cortex versus more brainstem areas by intragastric glucose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaf052.114
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

697. EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL OF GUT TASTE RECEPTORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISORDERED EATING BEHAVIOUR

Chin‐Hsuan Lin, Priya Sumithran, Robyn M. Brown, R Warmsley
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

697. EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL OF GUT TASTE RECEPTORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISORDERED EATING BEHAVIOUR

Chin‐Hsuan Lin, Priya Sumithran, Robyn M. Brown, R Warmsley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Individuals who suffer from disordered overeating often experience dysregulated food reward. As such, investigation of the mechanisms underlying food reward can contribute to our understanding of disordered eating behaviours. Emerging evidence highlights the role of post-ingestive gut–brain signalling in reinforcing food-related reward. The sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) expressed in the small intestine is the receptor that is thought to initiate gut-brain signalling of sugar reward. Phlorizin, a naturally occurring SGLT1 inhibitor, offers a pharmacological tool to investigate gut-mediated reinforcement. Aims & Objectives This study aimed to investigate 1) whether pharmacological inhibition of intestinal SGLT1 with phlorizin can reduce intra-gastrically delivered glucose reinforcement in mice; 2) patterns of brain activation induced by oral versus post-ingestive glucose. Method Adult male C57BL/6J mice self-administered either oral or intra-gastric 8% glucose, under fixed and progressive ratio schedules. A subset of mice received either 0.04% phlorizin v/v in 5% DMSO v/v vehicle, or vehicle alone, via intragastric infusion paired to oral glucose delivery. Brains were subsequently processed for c-Fos immunostaining to identify neuronal activation in brain regions relating to taste and reward. Results Mice operantly responded for both oral and intra-gastric glucose, demonstrating that gut delivery of glucose is reinforcing. Despite this, analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between phlorizin and vehicle groups (p > 0.05) in mice self-administering intra-gastric glucose. Subsequent immunohistochemistry analysis revealed distinct activation patterns associated with oral and post-ingestive glucose. Oral glucose was associated with higher c-fos expression in the rostral nucleus solitary tract, nucleus accumbens, and granular insular cortex (p < 0.05) whereas intragastric glucose was associated with higher c-fos expression in the caudal nucleus solitary tract and lateral parabrachial nucleus (p < 0.05). Discussion & Conclusions Collectively, these findings show that intestinal SGLT1 inhibition at the concentration tested does not impact gut-mediated glucose reward, suggesting a non-SGLT1 mediated mechanism. Further, fos expression data suggests that oral glucose rewards may be predominantly processed in mesolimbic regions and taste cortex versus more brainstem areas by intragastric glucose.

The International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologyVol. 28(Supplement_2)
The University of Melbourne (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), Alfred Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.