Comparative analysis of the mechanical properties of FDM and SLA 3D printed components

This study presents a comparative analysis of the mechanical and structural properties of materials fabricated using two prominent 3D printing techniques: fused deposition modelling (FDM) and stereolithography (SLA). Five materials were investigated: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) for FDM, and Tough 2000, Rigid 10K and Elastic 50A resins for SLA. Standardised test specimens were produced and evaluated through tensile, flexural (three-point bend), impact and Vickers hardness testing, with surface morphology assessed via optical microscopy. The results showed significant variation in mechanical performance across materials and printing methods. SLA-printed Rigid 10K resin demonstrated the highest tensile and flexural stiffness, whereas FDM-printed ABS exhibited superior impact resistance. Elastic 50A resin showed exceptional elongation at break but was unsuitable for flexural testing under standard conditions. Microscope imaging revealed that SLA parts had superior surface finish and layer uniformity, while FDM prints exhibited visible layer lines and occasional voids that influenced mechanical behaviour. The findings underscore the crucial role of material selection and printing technology in attaining the desired mechanical performance, offering valuable insights for engineers and designers in additive manufacturing applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Micromanufacturing
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25165984251364689
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of the mechanical properties of FDM and SLA 3D printed components

Liam O’Connor
4 citations
Journal of Micromanufacturing
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.73
article

Comparative analysis of the mechanical properties of FDM and SLA 3D printed components

Liam O’Connor
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of the mechanical and structural properties of materials fabricated using two prominent 3D printing techniques: fused deposition modelling (FDM) and stereolithography (SLA). Five materials were investigated: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) for FDM, and Tough 2000, Rigid 10K and Elastic 50A resins for SLA. Standardised test specimens were produced and evaluated through tensile, flexural (three-point bend), impact and Vickers hardness testing, with surface morphology assessed via optical microscopy. The results showed significant variation in mechanical performance across materials and printing methods. SLA-printed Rigid 10K resin demonstrated the highest tensile and flexural stiffness, whereas FDM-printed ABS exhibited superior impact resistance. Elastic 50A resin showed exceptional elongation at break but was unsuitable for flexural testing under standard conditions. Microscope imaging revealed that SLA parts had superior surface finish and layer uniformity, while FDM prints exhibited visible layer lines and occasional voids that influenced mechanical behaviour. The findings underscore the crucial role of material selection and printing technology in attaining the desired mechanical performance, offering valuable insights for engineers and designers in additive manufacturing applications.

Journal of Micromanufacturing
University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.