Evaluating the Efficacy of a Novel Titanium Cage System in ALIF and LLIF: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Analysis

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The success of lumbar interbody fusion depends on the implant design and the surgical approach used. This study evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) using a 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage system. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective, single-center review of 48 patients treated for degenerative lumbar spine disease was conducted. Patients underwent LLIF, ALIF, or a combination of both using a 3D-printed titanium cage system (J&J MedTech, Raynham, MA, USA). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) metrics were assessed after 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated the pre- and post-operative differences. Fusion performance and complications were assessed using the Bridwell grading system over 24 months. <b>Results</b>: A total of 78 levels (62 LLIF and 16 ALIF) were analyzed. Fusion rates were 90.3% (56/62) for LLIF levels and 81.3% (13/16) for ALIF levels by the end of 12 months. ODI scores improved significantly after 3 months (MD -13.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 6 months (MD -12.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 12 months (MD -14.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001). PROMIS Pain Interference scores improved after 3 months (MD -6.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 6 months (MD -3.4, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 12 months (MD -5.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001). PROMIS Physical Function scores improved after 3 months (MD +3.4, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and 12 months (MD +4.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: This novel interbody cage demonstrated high fusion rates, significant pain and function improvements, and a favorable safety profile, warranting further comparative studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165814
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Novel Titanium Cage System in ALIF and LLIF: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Analysis

Richelle J. Kim, Ryan Turlip, Hasan S. Ahmad, Daksh Chauhan et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.47
article

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Novel Titanium Cage System in ALIF and LLIF: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Analysis

Richelle J. Kim, Ryan Turlip, Hasan S. Ahmad, Daksh Chauhan, Yohannes Ghenbot, Jang W. Yoon, Mert Marcel Dagli, Richard J. Chung, J. Peter Kincaid
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The success of lumbar interbody fusion depends on the implant design and the surgical approach used. This study evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) using a 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage system. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective, single-center review of 48 patients treated for degenerative lumbar spine disease was conducted. Patients underwent LLIF, ALIF, or a combination of both using a 3D-printed titanium cage system (J&J MedTech, Raynham, MA, USA). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) metrics were assessed after 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated the pre- and post-operative differences. Fusion performance and complications were assessed using the Bridwell grading system over 24 months. <b>Results</b>: A total of 78 levels (62 LLIF and 16 ALIF) were analyzed. Fusion rates were 90.3% (56/62) for LLIF levels and 81.3% (13/16) for ALIF levels by the end of 12 months. ODI scores improved significantly after 3 months (MD -13.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 6 months (MD -12.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 12 months (MD -14.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001). PROMIS Pain Interference scores improved after 3 months (MD -6.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 6 months (MD -3.4, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 12 months (MD -5.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001). PROMIS Physical Function scores improved after 3 months (MD +3.4, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and 12 months (MD +4.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: This novel interbody cage demonstrated high fusion rates, significant pain and function improvements, and a favorable safety profile, warranting further comparative studies.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(16)
University of Virginia (US), Columbia University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Johnson and Johnson
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.