Use of Restrictive and Punishment Procedures: A Survey of Behavior Analysts

The use of restrictive and punishment procedures has been debated by professionals in the field of behavior analysis since the field's early days, being joined by disability rights advocates, particularly those in the neurodiversity movement, in modern decades. Despite arguments to eliminate or reduce the use of these procedures, no current data exists to provide an estimate of their frequency of use. The current study surveyed 534 behavior analysts on the frequency of their use of restrictive and punishment procedures with learners on their caseload at the time of the study. Results include descriptive summaries of the use of multiple procedures, as well as differences in use across several personal and professional factors. Implications for future directions in research and practice are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurodiversity
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27546330251367846
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Restrictive and Punishment Procedures: A Survey of Behavior Analysts

Jaime Flowers, Trudy Georgio, Emily M. Lund, Jillian Dawes
Neurodiversity
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Use of Restrictive and Punishment Procedures: A Survey of Behavior Analysts

Jaime Flowers, Trudy Georgio, Emily M. Lund, Jillian Dawes
article en

Abstract

The use of restrictive and punishment procedures has been debated by professionals in the field of behavior analysis since the field's early days, being joined by disability rights advocates, particularly those in the neurodiversity movement, in modern decades. Despite arguments to eliminate or reduce the use of these procedures, no current data exists to provide an estimate of their frequency of use. The current study surveyed 534 behavior analysts on the frequency of their use of restrictive and punishment procedures with learners on their caseload at the time of the study. Results include descriptive summaries of the use of multiple procedures, as well as differences in use across several personal and professional factors. Implications for future directions in research and practice are discussed.

NeurodiversityVol. 3
Bay Path University (US), Stephen F. Austin State University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Citadel (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.