Criminalising Collusion: A Comparative Analysis of Cartel Enforcement in India, Australia, And Singapore

This study presents a comparative legal analysis of cartel regulation in India, Australia, and Singapore, focusing on legal definitions, enforcement mechanisms, penalty regimes, and leniency programs. It examines how these jurisdictions, each operating within a common law framework but differing in economic maturity, address antitrust practices i.e. price-fixing, bid-rigging, and market allocation. This study adopts a doctrinal and comparative legal research methodology. It involves detailed analysis of statutory frameworks, judicial decisions, regulatory guidelines, and enforcement authority reports in each jurisdiction. The study is further supported by empirical data on penalties, case outcomes, and leniency program applications to assess enforcement effectiveness and practical impact.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Fraud & Security
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.725
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminalising Collusion: A Comparative Analysis of Cartel Enforcement in India, Australia, And Singapore

Kshitij Kumar
Computer Fraud & Security
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Criminalising Collusion: A Comparative Analysis of Cartel Enforcement in India, Australia, And Singapore

Kshitij Kumar
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative legal analysis of cartel regulation in India, Australia, and Singapore, focusing on legal definitions, enforcement mechanisms, penalty regimes, and leniency programs. It examines how these jurisdictions, each operating within a common law framework but differing in economic maturity, address antitrust practices i.e. price-fixing, bid-rigging, and market allocation. This study adopts a doctrinal and comparative legal research methodology. It involves detailed analysis of statutory frameworks, judicial decisions, regulatory guidelines, and enforcement authority reports in each jurisdiction. The study is further supported by empirical data on penalties, case outcomes, and leniency program applications to assess enforcement effectiveness and practical impact.

Computer Fraud & Security
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.