The Influence of Risk Assessment and Relationship Closeness on Bystander Actions

There are posited to be many factors that contribute to (or disinhibit) bystander action in response to having the opportunity. Some commonly cited factors include assessment of the riskiness of the situation, a person's relationship with the target of harm, and a person's own perceived barriers to intervention. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of risk assessment and relationship closeness on engaging in bystander action, in the context of personal barriers. Data from <i>n</i> = 1,594 college students who completed a campus climate survey and indicated having an opportunity to use bystander intervention were analyzed. Mediated moderation path analyses were used to examine whether relationship closeness moderated the relationship between risk assessment and bystander actions, mediated by bystander barriers in eight unique bystander situations. There was no association between risk assessment and bystander actions across situations (Hypothesis 1). Additionally, there was no interaction between risk assessment and relationship closeness across situations (Hypothesis 2). The relationship between risk assessment and bystander action was mediated by bystander barriers only in Situation 1 (i.e., witnessed intoxication with fear they'd be taken advantage of) (Hypothesis 3). Direct relationships were found in all situations between bystander barriers and taking action. Additional theoretical and empirical work needs to be conducted to understand factors that influence bystander actions in specific situations. Prevention programming, particularly bystander intervention programs, should continue to reduce barriers to bystander action in order to increase the likelihood that bystanders intervene when they witness something concerning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251360032
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Risk Assessment and Relationship Closeness on Bystander Actions

Michael J. Brienzo, Annelise Mennicke, Sam Cacace
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

The Influence of Risk Assessment and Relationship Closeness on Bystander Actions

Michael J. Brienzo, Annelise Mennicke, Sam Cacace
article en

Abstract

There are posited to be many factors that contribute to (or disinhibit) bystander action in response to having the opportunity. Some commonly cited factors include assessment of the riskiness of the situation, a person's relationship with the target of harm, and a person's own perceived barriers to intervention. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of risk assessment and relationship closeness on engaging in bystander action, in the context of personal barriers. Data from <i>n</i> = 1,594 college students who completed a campus climate survey and indicated having an opportunity to use bystander intervention were analyzed. Mediated moderation path analyses were used to examine whether relationship closeness moderated the relationship between risk assessment and bystander actions, mediated by bystander barriers in eight unique bystander situations. There was no association between risk assessment and bystander actions across situations (Hypothesis 1). Additionally, there was no interaction between risk assessment and relationship closeness across situations (Hypothesis 2). The relationship between risk assessment and bystander action was mediated by bystander barriers only in Situation 1 (i.e., witnessed intoxication with fear they'd be taken advantage of) (Hypothesis 3). Direct relationships were found in all situations between bystander barriers and taking action. Additional theoretical and empirical work needs to be conducted to understand factors that influence bystander actions in specific situations. Prevention programming, particularly bystander intervention programs, should continue to reduce barriers to bystander action in order to increase the likelihood that bystanders intervene when they witness something concerning.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Influence of Risk Assessment and Relationship Closeness on Bystander Actions — Michael J. Brienzo, Annelise Mennicke, et al. · Journal of Interpersonal Violence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS