Targeting everyday decision makers in research: early career researcher and patient and public involvement and engagement collaboration in an AI-in-healthcare project

Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is critical in the development and application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare research to ensure that outcomes align with patients' and the public's needs. However, current PPIE practices often limit involvement to reactive tasks such as reviewing documents and providing plain English summaries. Whilst important, this approach can sideline PPIE from influencing key research decisions. Consequently, PPIE interactions often fail to adequately reach and influence everyday decision makers. On AI and big data research projects, these decisions are often made by Early Career Researchers (ECRs) who play a vital role in the day-to-day research process. After realising these limitations, and to address them, the NIHR-funded AI MULTIPLY consortium introduced twice-monthly "ECRs meet PPIE" sessions. These sessions began in May 2024 and enabled ECRs to present and discuss work in progress and gain targeted input from PPIE members during early phases of research, such as research direction, data and variable selection. By integrating PPIE at this stage, the project aimed to improve the relevance and impact of the healthcare research but also provide ECRs with essential skills in public engagement. At time of writing, 12 sessions have been conducted. Through ethnographic observations integrated with internal surveys, the findings show how the sessions were developed, overcame challenges, and helped to embed PPIE contributors' voices into an AI-in-healthcare project. Based on our findings we have identified 5 recommendations for other large interdisciplinary consortia to strengthen the contribution of PPIE to everyday decision-making in research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Involvement and Engagement
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-025-00753-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Targeting everyday decision makers in research: early career researcher and patient and public involvement and engagement collaboration in an AI-in-healthcare project

Victoria Bartle, R. Hamish McAllister‐Williams, James M. S. Wason, Paolo Missier et al.
2 citations
Research Involvement and Engagement
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
5.63
article

Targeting everyday decision makers in research: early career researcher and patient and public involvement and engagement collaboration in an AI-in-healthcare project

Victoria Bartle, R. Hamish McAllister‐Williams, James M. S. Wason, Paolo Missier, Barbara Hanratty, Adam Todd, Megan Clinch, Tom Lawton, Nick J. Reynolds, Chris Plummer, Dexter Canoy, Olivia A. Grant, Deborah Swinglehurst, Sohan Seth, Duncan J. Reynolds, Elizabeth Remfry, Vanessa Apea, Ceri Durham, Neil Watson, Alastair D. Burt, Alexandra Thompson, Michael R. Barnes, Soraia Guerra-Sousa, Susan Mountain
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is critical in the development and application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare research to ensure that outcomes align with patients' and the public's needs. However, current PPIE practices often limit involvement to reactive tasks such as reviewing documents and providing plain English summaries. Whilst important, this approach can sideline PPIE from influencing key research decisions. Consequently, PPIE interactions often fail to adequately reach and influence everyday decision makers. On AI and big data research projects, these decisions are often made by Early Career Researchers (ECRs) who play a vital role in the day-to-day research process. After realising these limitations, and to address them, the NIHR-funded AI MULTIPLY consortium introduced twice-monthly "ECRs meet PPIE" sessions. These sessions began in May 2024 and enabled ECRs to present and discuss work in progress and gain targeted input from PPIE members during early phases of research, such as research direction, data and variable selection. By integrating PPIE at this stage, the project aimed to improve the relevance and impact of the healthcare research but also provide ECRs with essential skills in public engagement. At time of writing, 12 sessions have been conducted. Through ethnographic observations integrated with internal surveys, the findings show how the sessions were developed, overcame challenges, and helped to embed PPIE contributors' voices into an AI-in-healthcare project. Based on our findings we have identified 5 recommendations for other large interdisciplinary consortia to strengthen the contribution of PPIE to everyday decision-making in research.

Research Involvement and EngagementVol. 11(1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Philips (United Kingdom) (GB), NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (GB), William Harvey Research Institute (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.