Evolution of developmental bias explains divergent patterns of phenotypic evolution in two nematode clades

Rates of phenotypic evolution vary across traits, and these evolutionary patterns themselves evolve. Understanding how development contributes to such patterns remains a challenge because it requires large-scale measurement of phenotypic variation resulting from random mutations across multiple species. Using the experimentally tractable system of nematode vulval development, we quantified the evolution and mutational sensitivity of six cell fates across two clades. First, we find that the cell whose fate evolves fastest is distinct for each clade: P3.p in <i>Caenorhabditis</i> and P4.p in <i>Oscheius</i>. Second, we show that this evolutionary pattern matches the pattern of variation within species of each clade. Third, we find that within each clade, the differential effect on each cell of random mutation, quantified as their mutational phenotypic variance, is sufficient to explain the observed phenotypic evolution. Finally, we propose that the difference between clades is explained by a simple spatial shift across cells of the sensitive region in a Wnt dose-response curve. These findings underscore the importance of integrating the evolving structure of the genotype-phenotype map and measures of developmental sensitivity into the understanding of phenotypic change at both micro- and macroevolutionary scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2507529122
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of developmental bias explains divergent patterns of phenotypic evolution in two nematode clades

Charlotte Bouleau, Lewis Stevens, Pablo Manuel González De la Rosa, João Picão-Osório et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
1.91
article

Evolution of developmental bias explains divergent patterns of phenotypic evolution in two nematode clades

Charlotte Bouleau, Lewis Stevens, Pablo Manuel González De la Rosa, João Picão-Osório, Mark Blaxter, Christian Braendle, Marie-Anne Félix, Nina Fekonja
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Rates of phenotypic evolution vary across traits, and these evolutionary patterns themselves evolve. Understanding how development contributes to such patterns remains a challenge because it requires large-scale measurement of phenotypic variation resulting from random mutations across multiple species. Using the experimentally tractable system of nematode vulval development, we quantified the evolution and mutational sensitivity of six cell fates across two clades. First, we find that the cell whose fate evolves fastest is distinct for each clade: P3.p in <i>Caenorhabditis</i> and P4.p in <i>Oscheius</i>. Second, we show that this evolutionary pattern matches the pattern of variation within species of each clade. Third, we find that within each clade, the differential effect on each cell of random mutation, quantified as their mutational phenotypic variance, is sufficient to explain the observed phenotypic evolution. Finally, we propose that the difference between clades is explained by a simple spatial shift across cells of the sensitive region in a Wnt dose-response curve. These findings underscore the importance of integrating the evolving structure of the genotype-phenotype map and measures of developmental sensitivity into the understanding of phenotypic change at both micro- and macroevolutionary scales.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(34)
Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB), Institut de Biologie Valrose (FR), Institut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.