Considerations for delivery of live-remote exercise for people with cancer in research and practice

Exercise is safe and beneficial for people diagnosed with cancer. The use of live-remote exercise approaches, where exercise trainers deliver exercise programs via a videoconferencing platform, has increased rapidly, greatly expanding the reach of exercise programs. This method retains key elements of supervised exercise, which provide greater benefits than unsupervised programs. However, challenges in adapting in-person supervised exercise programs to remote delivery exist. This article discusses the key considerations for the effective and safe delivery of live-remote exercise, such as technological requirements, exercise professional skills, safety aspects, exercise programming features, social interactions, costs, and legal and ethical considerations. Considerations relevant for the design and execution of exercise oncology clinical trials and for community practice are described. Remaining knowledge gaps are outlined and point to opportunities to further inform evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Monographs
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaf029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerations for delivery of live-remote exercise for people with cancer in research and practice

Mark Trevaskis, Evelyn M. Monninkhof, Martijn M. Stuiver, David Binyam et al.
1 citations
JNCI Monographs
Cancer survivorship and care
1.05
article

Considerations for delivery of live-remote exercise for people with cancer in research and practice

Mark Trevaskis, Evelyn M. Monninkhof, Martijn M. Stuiver, David Binyam, Anouk E. Hiensch, Kelcey A. Bland, Eva M. Zopf, Nadira Gunasekara, Anne M. May, Anna Campbell, Mary E. Crisafio, Alberto J. Alves, Martina E. Schmidt, Kerri M. Winters‐Stone, Yvonne Wengström, Eva de Jongh, Kristin L. Campbell, Karen Steindorf, Fabrice Olivier, Michael Lorenz, Jana Müller, Dorothea Clauss, Alina Kias
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Exercise is safe and beneficial for people diagnosed with cancer. The use of live-remote exercise approaches, where exercise trainers deliver exercise programs via a videoconferencing platform, has increased rapidly, greatly expanding the reach of exercise programs. This method retains key elements of supervised exercise, which provide greater benefits than unsupervised programs. However, challenges in adapting in-person supervised exercise programs to remote delivery exist. This article discusses the key considerations for the effective and safe delivery of live-remote exercise, such as technological requirements, exercise professional skills, safety aspects, exercise programming features, social interactions, costs, and legal and ethical considerations. Considerations relevant for the design and execution of exercise oncology clinical trials and for community practice are described. Remaining knowledge gaps are outlined and point to opportunities to further inform evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence.

JNCI MonographsVol. 2025(71)
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), German Sport University Cologne (DE), University of British Columbia (CA), Oregon Health & Science University (US), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Utrecht University (NL), Heidelberg University (DE), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Institute of Cancer Research (CA), Cabrini Hospital (AU), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft (DE), Escola de Negócios e Administração (PT), Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (CA), Instituto Superior da Maia (PT), Heidelberg University (US), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Australian Government, European Commission, National Institutes of Health, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cancer survivorship and care
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.