Monitoring and manipulating autophagy in potato psyllids: impacts on accumulation and transmission of “ <i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter solanacearum” haplotypes A and B

"<i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter solanacearum" (Lso) is a highly destructive plant pathogen within the alpha-proteobacteria group. Multiple Lso haplotypes occur worldwide, each uniquely associated with a specific psyllid vector. Haplotypes A and B, found in the United States, cause serious damage to solanaceous crops and are transmitted by <i>Bactericera cockerelli</i>, known as the potato psyllid in a circulative and persistent manner. The psyllid gut is the first organ encountered by Lso and may act as a barrier to its transmission; however, the immune response of the gut to Lso infection remains largely uncharacterized. In this study, we examined autophagic responses in the gut of potato psyllids at early, mid, and late infection stages. Based on gene expression analyses, microscopic observations, and Western blotting, we found no clear evidence of autophagy induction despite Lso infection. Nevertheless, during mid and late phases of LsoB infection, we observed downregulation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin and decreased accumulation of ATG8-II. Notably, inducing autophagy with rapamycin significantly reduced LsoA titers in the psyllid guts after a 5-day acquisition access period and lowered transmission efficiency, while LsoB remained unaffected. These findings suggest that modulating autophagy in the gut of potato psyllids could be a promising strategy to limit LsoA acquisition and transmission, while highlighting LsoA and LsoB possess distinct molecular regulatory mechanisms in the psyllid gut.IMPORTANCELiberibacters are devastating plant pathogens transmitted by psyllids. Because these bacteria are fastidious, the study of the molecular mechanisms involved in plant infection and transmission is difficult. Here, we determined that inducing autophagy in the potato psyllid can affect the acquisition and transmission of Lso haplotype A but not haplotype B. Comparing the host and vector responses to different liberibacters can help identify their transmission and infection mechanisms and find targets to disrupt these processes.