The Effect of the Care Ecosystem Collaborative Care Model on End-of-Life Outcomes for People With Dementia and Their Caregivers

ContextCollaborative care models that feature care navigation have been found to have a range of benefit for people with dementia (PWD) and their caregivers, but their effect on end-of-life (EOL) outcomes has not been robustly evaluated.ObjectivesOur primary objective was to evaluate the effect of the Care Ecosystem-a telephone-based collaborative care model for dementia with care navigation-on EOL outcomes for PWD and their caregivers. Our secondary objective was to use qualitative feedback from participants to identify supports and services that would be helpful at end of life, including how the Care Ecosystem and other EOL supports could be improved.MethodsMixed-methods analysis of the Care Ecosystem trial conducted 2015-2022. Pre-mortem and post-mortem surveys included close-ended validated measures (eg, satisfaction with end-of-life care, caregiver self-efficacy) and open-ended questions about EOL care.ResultsThere were 138/124 dyads randomized to Care Ecosystem and 76/65 randomized to Usual Care in the pre-mortem/post-mortem cohorts. Compared to Usual Care, Care Ecosystem caregivers had higher ratings of caregiver self-efficacy prior to PWD death (Adjusted unstandardized Beta 0.94 95% CI 0.23, 1.65, <i>P</i> = 0.01), but caregiver's satisfaction with EOL care did not differ between groups (Adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% CI 0.67, 2.99. <i>P</i> = 0.36). Qualitative analysis revealed Care Ecosystem provided helpful emotional and practical support, but participants wanted more anticipatory guidance, more information about hospice care and earlier referral, and better coordination with the healthcare team.ConclusionOur findings highlight opportunities to improve the EOL experience of PWD through collaborative care models and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251367311
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of the Care Ecosystem Collaborative Care Model on End-of-Life Outcomes for People With Dementia and Their Caregivers

Stephen J. Bonasera, Winston Chiong, Jennifer Merrilees, Krista L. Harrison et al.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

The Effect of the Care Ecosystem Collaborative Care Model on End-of-Life Outcomes for People With Dementia and Their Caregivers

Stephen J. Bonasera, Winston Chiong, Jennifer Merrilees, Krista L. Harrison, Sarah Dulaney, Lauren J. Hunt, Kirby Lee, Isabel Elaine Allen, Tamara Braley, Sarah Hooper, Rachel Kiekhofer, Katherine L. Possin, Alissa Bernstein Sideman, Bruce L. Miller
article en

Abstract

ContextCollaborative care models that feature care navigation have been found to have a range of benefit for people with dementia (PWD) and their caregivers, but their effect on end-of-life (EOL) outcomes has not been robustly evaluated.ObjectivesOur primary objective was to evaluate the effect of the Care Ecosystem-a telephone-based collaborative care model for dementia with care navigation-on EOL outcomes for PWD and their caregivers. Our secondary objective was to use qualitative feedback from participants to identify supports and services that would be helpful at end of life, including how the Care Ecosystem and other EOL supports could be improved.MethodsMixed-methods analysis of the Care Ecosystem trial conducted 2015-2022. Pre-mortem and post-mortem surveys included close-ended validated measures (eg, satisfaction with end-of-life care, caregiver self-efficacy) and open-ended questions about EOL care.ResultsThere were 138/124 dyads randomized to Care Ecosystem and 76/65 randomized to Usual Care in the pre-mortem/post-mortem cohorts. Compared to Usual Care, Care Ecosystem caregivers had higher ratings of caregiver self-efficacy prior to PWD death (Adjusted unstandardized Beta 0.94 95% CI 0.23, 1.65, <i>P</i> = 0.01), but caregiver's satisfaction with EOL care did not differ between groups (Adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% CI 0.67, 2.99. <i>P</i> = 0.36). Qualitative analysis revealed Care Ecosystem provided helpful emotional and practical support, but participants wanted more anticipatory guidance, more information about hospice care and earlier referral, and better coordination with the healthcare team.ConclusionOur findings highlight opportunities to improve the EOL experience of PWD through collaborative care models and beyond.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), Lee University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Baystate Health (US), United Continental (United States) (US), Global Brain Health Institute (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alzheimer's Association, Larry L. Hillblom Foundation, Johns Hopkins University, Global Brain Health Institute, Rainwater Charitable Foundation, John Douglas French Alzheimer's Foundation, University of Cambridge, University of Oxford, National Institutes of Health, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.