Cognitive Assessment in Occupational Therapy: A Qualitative Analysis

Current occupational therapy practice primarily consists of informal, unstandardized methods of identifying cognitive impairments. Use of standardized assessment is infrequent. Personal and organizational barriers identified were consistent with those identified in the literature. Despite endorsing identified barriers that are perceived as constraining their use, an outlier group consistently used PBTs of functional cognition. This outlier group's negotiation of barriers presents opportunities for how to target evidence-based implementation efforts. Plain-Language Summary: This article describes occupational therapists' current practices related to the use of cognitive tests. We asked therapists about factors that affect their use of different types of formal cognitive tests; specifically, we looked at the use of pencil-and-paper cognitive tests versus tests that use simulated real-world activities to assess function. Occupational therapists reported many barriers to using cognitive tests of either type, including a lack of time, difficulty accessing tests, and unfamiliar tests that are hard to learn. Most therapists predominantly use informal methods of assessing client's cognition or pencil-and-paper screening methods. One group differed in that its members mostly used formal assessments of simulated real-world tasks to evaluate the ability to perform everyday life tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.051112
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Assessment in Occupational Therapy: A Qualitative Analysis

Anna E. Boone, Dorothy Farrar‐Edwards, Timothy Wolf, Gordon Muir Giles et al.
3 citations
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
17.32
article

Cognitive Assessment in Occupational Therapy: A Qualitative Analysis

Anna E. Boone, Dorothy Farrar‐Edwards, Timothy Wolf, Gordon Muir Giles, Timothy S. Marks
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Current occupational therapy practice primarily consists of informal, unstandardized methods of identifying cognitive impairments. Use of standardized assessment is infrequent. Personal and organizational barriers identified were consistent with those identified in the literature. Despite endorsing identified barriers that are perceived as constraining their use, an outlier group consistently used PBTs of functional cognition. This outlier group's negotiation of barriers presents opportunities for how to target evidence-based implementation efforts. Plain-Language Summary: This article describes occupational therapists' current practices related to the use of cognitive tests. We asked therapists about factors that affect their use of different types of formal cognitive tests; specifically, we looked at the use of pencil-and-paper cognitive tests versus tests that use simulated real-world activities to assess function. Occupational therapists reported many barriers to using cognitive tests of either type, including a lack of time, difficulty accessing tests, and unfamiliar tests that are hard to learn. Most therapists predominantly use informal methods of assessing client's cognition or pencil-and-paper screening methods. One group differed in that its members mostly used formal assessments of simulated real-world tasks to evaluate the ability to perform everyday life tasks.

American Journal of Occupational TherapyVol. 79(5)
University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
17.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.