Difference-Making Conditions for the Successful Implementation of IDEAS: A Provider Stigma-Reduction Training for and by Occupational Therapy Practitioners

In addition to identifying effective evidence-based interventions to improve clinical practice, occupational therapy practitioners and their clients also stand to gain through a careful consideration of how implementation factors influence the success of evidence-based practices in real-world settings. Plain-Language Summary: This study looks at how to successfully use a program called Identity Development Evolution and Sharing (IDEAS) in occupational therapy settings. IDEAS is a training that helps reduce bias and stigma among health care providers by sharing real stories from people who have experienced discrimination in health care. Bias in health care can lead to unfair treatment and poor outcomes for people receiving health care. Reducing this bias is essential for making health care more fair and inclusive. Occupational therapists want to support equity, but they need effective tools and strategies to do so. IDEAS is one such tool, but it only works well when certain conditions are present. The researchers studied how IDEAS was used in nine occupational therapy clinics across the United States. They looked at what helped or hurt the success of the program, using a method called coincidence analysis to find out which variables made the biggest difference. Two key things helped make IDEAS successful: (1) design quality and packaging (how well the training materials were put together and how easy they were to use) and (2) external facilitation (support from an outside expert who trained and guided the person who led IDEAS in their clinic). If either of these was strong, the program worked well. If both were strong, it worked even better. Other variables such as a positive impression of the IDEAS program and a receptive workplace culture were also related to how well the IDEAS program worked. Occupational therapists who want to reduce bias in their practice can use IDEAS more effectively by making sure the training materials are clear and easy to use, getting support from someone experienced with the program, and creating a workplace culture that is open to learning and change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.051085
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Difference-Making Conditions for the Successful Implementation of IDEAS: A Provider Stigma-Reduction Training for and by Occupational Therapy Practitioners

Sally Wasmuth, Edward J. Miech, Dawn M. Bravata
1 citations
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
5.77
article

Difference-Making Conditions for the Successful Implementation of IDEAS: A Provider Stigma-Reduction Training for and by Occupational Therapy Practitioners

Sally Wasmuth, Edward J. Miech, Dawn M. Bravata
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In addition to identifying effective evidence-based interventions to improve clinical practice, occupational therapy practitioners and their clients also stand to gain through a careful consideration of how implementation factors influence the success of evidence-based practices in real-world settings. Plain-Language Summary: This study looks at how to successfully use a program called Identity Development Evolution and Sharing (IDEAS) in occupational therapy settings. IDEAS is a training that helps reduce bias and stigma among health care providers by sharing real stories from people who have experienced discrimination in health care. Bias in health care can lead to unfair treatment and poor outcomes for people receiving health care. Reducing this bias is essential for making health care more fair and inclusive. Occupational therapists want to support equity, but they need effective tools and strategies to do so. IDEAS is one such tool, but it only works well when certain conditions are present. The researchers studied how IDEAS was used in nine occupational therapy clinics across the United States. They looked at what helped or hurt the success of the program, using a method called coincidence analysis to find out which variables made the biggest difference. Two key things helped make IDEAS successful: (1) design quality and packaging (how well the training materials were put together and how easy they were to use) and (2) external facilitation (support from an outside expert who trained and guided the person who led IDEAS in their clinic). If either of these was strong, the program worked well. If both were strong, it worked even better. Other variables such as a positive impression of the IDEAS program and a receptive workplace culture were also related to how well the IDEAS program worked. Occupational therapists who want to reduce bias in their practice can use IDEAS more effectively by making sure the training materials are clear and easy to use, getting support from someone experienced with the program, and creating a workplace culture that is open to learning and change.

American Journal of Occupational TherapyVol. 79(5)
Indiana University Health (US), Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.