Deception, Sex, and the Law: The Case for Criminalising Sex-By-Deception

Remember, sex is about consent', reads the Metropolitan Police's webpage on rape and sexual assault.Indeed, the law in many jurisdictions places 'consent' at the heart of rape law; the legal definition of rape is sexual contact without consent. 1What delineates legally permissible from illicit sexual activity is valid consent.Even in cases where minors and the cognitively impaired purport to provide consent, the law views the victim's consent as invalid and deems the sexual encounter non-consensual (Kukla 2021).Put simply, consent is a necessary condition for legally permissible sex such that all non-consensual sexual acts are ostensibly criminalised.Thus emerges a simple equation: sex minus consent equals rape under the law.Rape law, however, proves an exception to the legal maxim that 'fraud will vitiate consent' (NLRB v. Dadourian Exp.Corp.).As discussed, the concept of 'consent' is central to the legal definition of rape, but sexual consent induced by deception is not criminalised in most circumstances.To be sure, many jurisdictions define 'consent' such that 'consent obtained by deception is "no consent" at all' (Rubenfeld 2013, p. 1376).Florida's sexual battery law, for example, requires consent to be 'intelligent, knowing, and voluntary' (Florida Statutes 794.011(1)(a).Yet, in most jurisdictions sex involving deception is typically deemed consensual.Rubenfeld (2013) has coined this contradiction 'the riddle of rape-by-deception'. 2 That is, the law defines 1 For example, the United Kingdom's Sexual Offences Act 2003 provides the following three elements of the crime of rape: '(a) [person A] intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b) B does not consent to the penetration, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents' (emphasis added). 2 The words 'sex' and 'rape' typically connote permissible and impermissible conduct, respectively.Although I will argue that it is appropriate to conceive of the conduct in question as a form of sexual assault, to avoid stacking the deck from the outset I use the terms 'rape-by-deception', 'sex-by-deception', and 'deceptive sex' interchangeably.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Res Publica
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-025-09732-z
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deception, Sex, and the Law: The Case for Criminalising Sex-By-Deception

Arjan S. Heir
Res Publica
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Deception, Sex, and the Law: The Case for Criminalising Sex-By-Deception

Arjan S. Heir
article en

Abstract

Remember, sex is about consent', reads the Metropolitan Police's webpage on rape and sexual assault.Indeed, the law in many jurisdictions places 'consent' at the heart of rape law; the legal definition of rape is sexual contact without consent. 1What delineates legally permissible from illicit sexual activity is valid consent.Even in cases where minors and the cognitively impaired purport to provide consent, the law views the victim's consent as invalid and deems the sexual encounter non-consensual (Kukla 2021).Put simply, consent is a necessary condition for legally permissible sex such that all non-consensual sexual acts are ostensibly criminalised.Thus emerges a simple equation: sex minus consent equals rape under the law.Rape law, however, proves an exception to the legal maxim that 'fraud will vitiate consent' (NLRB v. Dadourian Exp.Corp.).As discussed, the concept of 'consent' is central to the legal definition of rape, but sexual consent induced by deception is not criminalised in most circumstances.To be sure, many jurisdictions define 'consent' such that 'consent obtained by deception is "no consent" at all' (Rubenfeld 2013, p. 1376).Florida's sexual battery law, for example, requires consent to be 'intelligent, knowing, and voluntary' (Florida Statutes 794.011(1)(a).Yet, in most jurisdictions sex involving deception is typically deemed consensual.Rubenfeld (2013) has coined this contradiction 'the riddle of rape-by-deception'. 2 That is, the law defines 1 For example, the United Kingdom's Sexual Offences Act 2003 provides the following three elements of the crime of rape: '(a) [person A] intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b) B does not consent to the penetration, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents' (emphasis added). 2 The words 'sex' and 'rape' typically connote permissible and impermissible conduct, respectively.Although I will argue that it is appropriate to conceive of the conduct in question as a form of sexual assault, to avoid stacking the deck from the outset I use the terms 'rape-by-deception', 'sex-by-deception', and 'deceptive sex' interchangeably.

Res PublicaVol. 31(4)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Cambridge Trust, Gates Cambridge Trust
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.