Accuracy of Reported Sizes of the EVO/EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer® Lenses

Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess the variability between published manufacturer sizes and actual sizes measured in the operating room (OR) for Implantable Collamer® Lenses (ICLs) (STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, CA). Methods A prospective observational study was performed where the diagonal length of 50 ICLs from 50 consecutive cases was measured between June 26, 2023, and November 1, 2023. ICLs were positioned "face down" next to an OR ruler and photographed using the NGENUITY® 3D Visualization System (Alcon, Geneva, Switzerland). These images were processed in Adobe Photoshop 24.6 (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA) to eliminate perspective distortions, and the images were scaled using known dimensions of the OR ruler. Accurate diagonal measurements were taken using the caliper tool. Measurements were repeated across ICLs in the other direction to ensure consistency. Average size discrepancy, defined as measured ICL size minus published ICL size, was reported along with standard deviation (SD) and confidence interval (CI). A two one-sided t-test (TOST) was used to compare statistical equivalence between spherical and toric ICLs within a 0.017 mm margin. Results TOST analysis revealed that the mean measured size of all lens sizes (12.1 mm, 12.6 mm, and 13.2 mm) and types (spherical and toric) is statistically equivalent (α = 0.05) to their labeled size, indicating a high level of manufacturing precision. No ICLs deviated from published measurements by more than 0.05 mm. Conclusion The actual sizes of ICLs closely match the published manufacturer sizes, suggesting high manufacturing precision. There is no significant variability between spherical and toric ICLs, supporting the reliability of published sizing for clinical decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.90468
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Reported Sizes of the EVO/EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer® Lenses

Matthew Hirabayashi, Taj Nasser, Gurpal Virdi, Gregory Parkhurst et al.
Cureus
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Accuracy of Reported Sizes of the EVO/EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer® Lenses

Matthew Hirabayashi, Taj Nasser, Gurpal Virdi, Gregory Parkhurst, Peeradol Wattanasirakul
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess the variability between published manufacturer sizes and actual sizes measured in the operating room (OR) for Implantable Collamer® Lenses (ICLs) (STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, CA). Methods A prospective observational study was performed where the diagonal length of 50 ICLs from 50 consecutive cases was measured between June 26, 2023, and November 1, 2023. ICLs were positioned "face down" next to an OR ruler and photographed using the NGENUITY® 3D Visualization System (Alcon, Geneva, Switzerland). These images were processed in Adobe Photoshop 24.6 (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA) to eliminate perspective distortions, and the images were scaled using known dimensions of the OR ruler. Accurate diagonal measurements were taken using the caliper tool. Measurements were repeated across ICLs in the other direction to ensure consistency. Average size discrepancy, defined as measured ICL size minus published ICL size, was reported along with standard deviation (SD) and confidence interval (CI). A two one-sided t-test (TOST) was used to compare statistical equivalence between spherical and toric ICLs within a 0.017 mm margin. Results TOST analysis revealed that the mean measured size of all lens sizes (12.1 mm, 12.6 mm, and 13.2 mm) and types (spherical and toric) is statistically equivalent (α = 0.05) to their labeled size, indicating a high level of manufacturing precision. No ICLs deviated from published measurements by more than 0.05 mm. Conclusion The actual sizes of ICLs closely match the published manufacturer sizes, suggesting high manufacturing precision. There is no significant variability between spherical and toric ICLs, supporting the reliability of published sizing for clinical decisions.

CureusVol. 17(8)
Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates (US), Virginia Mason Institute (US), Katzen Eye Care & Laser Center (US), University of Missouri (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.