Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology on the refusal and discontinuation of dialysis

Renal failure is considered a life-limiting CONDITION that often requires Renal Replacement Therapy, such as dialysis or kidney transplantation. Dialysis can effectively relieve symptoms and prolong life, but its withdrawal results in severe complications and death. The decision to discontinue or refuse to dialysis must be made collaboratively by the patient, family, and healthcare team, considering the clinical condition, life expectancy, symptom burden, and individual preferences. This decision, involving clinical, bioethical, and legal aspects, is complex and requires a collective understanding of the process. Withdrawal to dialysis presents a challenge for nephrologists and the healthcare team due to the lack of clear guidelines, which can compromis the safety of the process and the patient's dignity. In this position statement, the Brazilian Society of Nephrology recommends a process for dialysis withdrawal or refusal, including identifying eligible patients, applying prognostic assessment tools, shared decision-making, advance care planning, and offering dialysis alternatives. The decision must be consensual, allowing adequate time for reflection, and healthcare services must provide comprehensive management of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual symptoms, as well as end-of-life care. Proper documentation in medical records is essential to ensure process transparency. Therefore, refusal or withdrawal to dialysis should be an informed decision that respects individual autonomy and balances clinical, bioethical, spiritual, and legal considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brazilian Journal of Nephrology
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2025-0057en
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology on the refusal and discontinuation of dialysis

Dirceu Reis da Silva, José A. Moura-Neto, Maurício Younes-Ibrahim, Pedro Túlio Rocha et al.
Brazilian Journal of Nephrology
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology on the refusal and discontinuation of dialysis

Dirceu Reis da Silva, José A. Moura-Neto, Maurício Younes-Ibrahim, Pedro Túlio Rocha, Cibele Isaac Saad Rodrigues, Ana Flávia Moura, Fernanda Salomão Gorayeb-Polacchini, Patrícia Ferreira Abreu, Eduardo Rocha, Marina Aline Occhiena de Oliveira Neiva
article en

Abstract

Renal failure is considered a life-limiting CONDITION that often requires Renal Replacement Therapy, such as dialysis or kidney transplantation. Dialysis can effectively relieve symptoms and prolong life, but its withdrawal results in severe complications and death. The decision to discontinue or refuse to dialysis must be made collaboratively by the patient, family, and healthcare team, considering the clinical condition, life expectancy, symptom burden, and individual preferences. This decision, involving clinical, bioethical, and legal aspects, is complex and requires a collective understanding of the process. Withdrawal to dialysis presents a challenge for nephrologists and the healthcare team due to the lack of clear guidelines, which can compromis the safety of the process and the patient's dignity. In this position statement, the Brazilian Society of Nephrology recommends a process for dialysis withdrawal or refusal, including identifying eligible patients, applying prognostic assessment tools, shared decision-making, advance care planning, and offering dialysis alternatives. The decision must be consensual, allowing adequate time for reflection, and healthcare services must provide comprehensive management of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual symptoms, as well as end-of-life care. Proper documentation in medical records is essential to ensure process transparency. Therefore, refusal or withdrawal to dialysis should be an informed decision that respects individual autonomy and balances clinical, bioethical, spiritual, and legal considerations.

Brazilian Journal of NephrologyVol. 47(3)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (BR), Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Hospital de Base (BR), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (BR), Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (BR), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR), Instituto de Gastroenterologia de Goiânia (BR), Universidade de Sorocaba (BR), Clinica De Doencas Renais De Brasilia (BR), Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS (BR), Sociedade de Nefrologia do Estado de São Paulo (BR), Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica (BR), Hospital de Base (BR), Elabora Consultoria (Brazil) (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.