A Single-Center Prospective Evaluation of Oncoplastic Crescent Incision in the Surgical Management of Large and Multiple Benign Breast Lesions

Background Benign breast diseases constitute a significant proportion of breast pathologies, often requiring surgical excision. Excision of large or multiple lesions by conventional approaches may compromise cosmetic outcomes, especially for peripheral lesions. Oncoplastic techniques offer a way to achieve complete excision while preserving breast aesthetics. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, cosmetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction associated with the oncoplastic crescent incision technique for the excision of large and/or multiple benign breast lesions compared to the conventional periareolar approach. Methodology A prospective, comparative cohort study was conducted in a single tertiary care center, from April 2022 to August 2023, on 74 histologically confirmed large (>3 cm) and/or multiple benign breast lesions. Breast lesions were excised by crescent oncoplasty incision (Group A) or periareolar incision (Group B). Surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, scar quality, breast symmetry, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed using objective measurements such as the Vancouver Scar Scale, sonographic scar thickness, and the BREAST-Q questionnaire with a follow-up of three months. Results The crescent incision provided better access for peripheral lesions (mean lesion-to-nipple-areolar complex (NAC) distance: 3.20 ± 0.71 cm vs. 2.37 ± 0.82 cm, p < 0.001) and was more frequently used for lesions >5 cm (33% vs. 9%, p = 0.0051). Postoperative breast symmetry was significantly better in the crescent group based on sternal notch-to-nipple and midline-to-nipple measurements (p < 0.01). Cosmetic outcomes were superior in the crescent group based on the Vancouver Scar Scale (4.24 ± 1.93 vs. 6.62 ± 1.72, p < 0.001) and sonographic scar thickness (p = 0.02). Nipple sensation was preserved in all Group A patients. BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction, psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being were comparable between groups throughout follow-up. Conclusions The oncoplastic crescent incision is a safe and effective alternative to the conventional periareolar approach for excising large or multiple benign breast lesions. It provides superior cosmetic outcomes, better lesion access, and comparable patient-reported quality of life, supporting its broader adoption in benign breast surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.90059
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Single-Center Prospective Evaluation of Oncoplastic Crescent Incision in the Surgical Management of Large and Multiple Benign Breast Lesions

Ved Prakash Rao Cheruvu, Moorat Singh Yadav, Saif Khan, Radha Sarawagi et al.
3 links
Cureus
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

A Single-Center Prospective Evaluation of Oncoplastic Crescent Incision in the Surgical Management of Large and Multiple Benign Breast Lesions

Ved Prakash Rao Cheruvu, Moorat Singh Yadav, Saif Khan, Radha Sarawagi, Suprateek Saha, Swagata Bramhachari
article en

Abstract

Background Benign breast diseases constitute a significant proportion of breast pathologies, often requiring surgical excision. Excision of large or multiple lesions by conventional approaches may compromise cosmetic outcomes, especially for peripheral lesions. Oncoplastic techniques offer a way to achieve complete excision while preserving breast aesthetics. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, cosmetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction associated with the oncoplastic crescent incision technique for the excision of large and/or multiple benign breast lesions compared to the conventional periareolar approach. Methodology A prospective, comparative cohort study was conducted in a single tertiary care center, from April 2022 to August 2023, on 74 histologically confirmed large (>3 cm) and/or multiple benign breast lesions. Breast lesions were excised by crescent oncoplasty incision (Group A) or periareolar incision (Group B). Surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, scar quality, breast symmetry, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed using objective measurements such as the Vancouver Scar Scale, sonographic scar thickness, and the BREAST-Q questionnaire with a follow-up of three months. Results The crescent incision provided better access for peripheral lesions (mean lesion-to-nipple-areolar complex (NAC) distance: 3.20 ± 0.71 cm vs. 2.37 ± 0.82 cm, p < 0.001) and was more frequently used for lesions >5 cm (33% vs. 9%, p = 0.0051). Postoperative breast symmetry was significantly better in the crescent group based on sternal notch-to-nipple and midline-to-nipple measurements (p < 0.01). Cosmetic outcomes were superior in the crescent group based on the Vancouver Scar Scale (4.24 ± 1.93 vs. 6.62 ± 1.72, p < 0.001) and sonographic scar thickness (p = 0.02). Nipple sensation was preserved in all Group A patients. BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction, psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being were comparable between groups throughout follow-up. Conclusions The oncoplastic crescent incision is a safe and effective alternative to the conventional periareolar approach for excising large or multiple benign breast lesions. It provides superior cosmetic outcomes, better lesion access, and comparable patient-reported quality of life, supporting its broader adoption in benign breast surgery.

CureusVol. 17(8)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.