Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Completely Intracorporeal Jejunal Pouch Reconstruction After Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Analysis from Germany

<b>Background</b>: Gastric cancer is increasingly being diagnosed at early stages, enabling the application of curative oncological and surgical approaches. With the growing adoption of minimally invasive techniques, robotic surgery is gaining increasing prominence in the operating rooms. As described by Stoyanova et al., the robotic completely intracorporeal jejunal pouch reconstruction after gastrectomy offers potential benefits, including technical feasibility without significant intraoperative challenges or prolonged operative times, as well as long-term advantages such as a reduced incidence of midline incision hernias. <b>Objectives</b>: This retrospective, single-center study is the first to compare the clinical and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic <i>versus</i> robotic completely intracorporeal jejunal pouch reconstruction following gastrectomy. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 27 patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2018 and 2025 were included in the study, and were divided into two groups: 12 patients in the robotic and 15 patients in the laparoscopic group. The study evaluated mean operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital and ICU stay, and certain oncological outcomes. <b>Results</b>: A main purpose of the robotic method is the avoidance of an unfavourable midline incision due to the completely intracorporeal pouch reconstruction without substantial technical or clinical disadvantages. <b>Conclusions</b>: Further research involving larger patient cohorts and extended follow-up periods is necessary to draw more definitive conclusions about the relative advantages of this surgical technique.