The path-label reconciliation (PLR) dissimilarity measure for gene trees

We show that PLR can be computed in linear time and that it is a semi-metric. We also discuss the diameters of reconciled gene tree measures, which are important in practice for normalization, and provide initial bounds on PLR, LRF, and ELRF. To validate PLR, we simulate reconciliations and perform comparisons with LRF and ELRF. The results show that PLR provides a more evenly distributed range of distances, making it less susceptible to overestimating differences in the presence of small topological changes, while at the same time being computationally efficient. We also apply our measure to evaluate the set of possible rootings of gene trees against a gold standard, and demonstrate that our measure is better at distinguishing one best gene tree among multiple candidates. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the theoretical diameter is rarely reached in practice. The PLR measure advances phylogenetic reconciliation by combining theoretical rigor with practical applicability. Future research will refine its mathematical properties, explore its performance on different types of trees, and integrate it with existing bioinformatics tools for large-scale evolutionary analyses. The implementation of the PLR distance is available in the open-source PyPI package parle: https://pypi.org/project/parle/ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms for Molecular Biology
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13015-025-00284-8
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The path-label reconciliation (PLR) dissimilarity measure for gene trees

José Antonio Ramírez-Rafael, Manuel Lafond, Maribel Hernández-Rosales, Alejandro Flores-Lamas et al.
Algorithms for Molecular Biology
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

The path-label reconciliation (PLR) dissimilarity measure for gene trees

José Antonio Ramírez-Rafael, Manuel Lafond, Maribel Hernández-Rosales, Alejandro Flores-Lamas, Alitzel López Sánchez
article en

Abstract

We show that PLR can be computed in linear time and that it is a semi-metric. We also discuss the diameters of reconciled gene tree measures, which are important in practice for normalization, and provide initial bounds on PLR, LRF, and ELRF. To validate PLR, we simulate reconciliations and perform comparisons with LRF and ELRF. The results show that PLR provides a more evenly distributed range of distances, making it less susceptible to overestimating differences in the presence of small topological changes, while at the same time being computationally efficient. We also apply our measure to evaluate the set of possible rootings of gene trees against a gold standard, and demonstrate that our measure is better at distinguishing one best gene tree among multiple candidates. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the theoretical diameter is rarely reached in practice. The PLR measure advances phylogenetic reconciliation by combining theoretical rigor with practical applicability. Future research will refine its mathematical properties, explore its performance on different types of trees, and integrate it with existing bioinformatics tools for large-scale evolutionary analyses. The implementation of the PLR distance is available in the open-source PyPI package parle: https://pypi.org/project/parle/ .

Algorithms for Molecular BiologyVol. 20(1)
Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Irapuato (MX), Telstra (Australia) (AU), Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences (DE), Max Planck Institute for Mathematics (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Université de Sherbrooke, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.