The majority is the priority: a qualitative, intersectional perspective on LGBTQ+ marginalisation within health and social care service pathways in North East England

While health inequities are primarily driven by economics, there is growing evidence of the impact of social inequities on the health of marginalised population groups. Underpinned by an intersectional, queer, feminist theoretical framework, this article explores the health and social care pathways of LGBTQ+ people who experienced disadvantage and marginalisation in North East England, a region with lower life expectancy and higher health inequity than the rest of the country. Qualitative interview data were collected from 33 care professionals and 39 LGBTQ+ people. Descriptive phenomenological methods were used to identify the essence of interviews – the majority is the priority – which served as an axis for discussion. Three key themes were generated which focused on informing future service provision, describing how structural inequity and normative service provision within current frameworks contributed to LGBTQ+ disadvantage being rendered invisible. This article suggests that an understanding and application of health inequity that is constrained within a framework of economic disadvantage will continue to sideline those on the margins. It calls for greater consideration of social inequity, and recommends a utilitarian position that considers ‘all of us’ rather than ‘us and them’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2547497
Citations
3
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The majority is the priority: a qualitative, intersectional perspective on LGBTQ+ marginalisation within health and social care service pathways in North East England

Mark Adley, Amy Jane O'Donnell, Stephanie Scott
3 citations
Critical Public Health
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
7.32
article

The majority is the priority: a qualitative, intersectional perspective on LGBTQ+ marginalisation within health and social care service pathways in North East England

Mark Adley, Amy Jane O'Donnell, Stephanie Scott
article en
3 citations

Abstract

While health inequities are primarily driven by economics, there is growing evidence of the impact of social inequities on the health of marginalised population groups. Underpinned by an intersectional, queer, feminist theoretical framework, this article explores the health and social care pathways of LGBTQ+ people who experienced disadvantage and marginalisation in North East England, a region with lower life expectancy and higher health inequity than the rest of the country. Qualitative interview data were collected from 33 care professionals and 39 LGBTQ+ people. Descriptive phenomenological methods were used to identify the essence of interviews – the majority is the priority – which served as an axis for discussion. Three key themes were generated which focused on informing future service provision, describing how structural inequity and normative service provision within current frameworks contributed to LGBTQ+ disadvantage being rendered invisible. This article suggests that an understanding and application of health inequity that is constrained within a framework of economic disadvantage will continue to sideline those on the margins. It calls for greater consideration of social inequity, and recommends a utilitarian position that considers ‘all of us’ rather than ‘us and them’.

Critical Public HealthVol. 35(1)
Newcastle University (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The majority is the priority: a qualitative, intersectional perspective on LGBTQ+ marginalisation within health and social care service pathways in North East England — Mark Adley, Amy Jane O'Donnell, et al. · Critical Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS