A competing risk analysis of predictors of time to lost to follow-up among adults with TB/HIV coinfection in Bahir Dar

Lost to follow-up (LTFU), defined as interrupting anti-TB treatment for ≥ 8 consecutive weeks or missing anti-retroviral therapy (ART) appointments for > 90 days, is a barrier to TB/HIV coinfection management. Poor treatment adherence, a driver of multidrug resistance in TB/HIV, poses critical challenges to case management. Overestimating effect sizes when considering mutually exclusive events, like LTFU from ART and anti-TB treatment, can occur if sources of error are not properly accounted for in competing events. However, studies estimating the effect sizes of predictors of time to LTFU using competing risk analysis are scarce. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the predictors of time to LTFU among adults with TB/HIV coinfection. We conducted a multicenter facility-based retrospective follow-up study. We randomly selected 471 TB/HIV coinfected adults. Data were extracted using standardised checklists. The LTFUs from ART and anti-TB treatment were events of interest and competing events, respectively, and others were censored. The data were entered into Epi data and then exported to Stata and Rstudio. Statistical differences were tested by Gray's test, and the cumulative incidence of each event was estimated by a cumulative incidence function. Bivariable and multivariable competing risk regression models were fitted, and variables with p values < 0.05 were considered significant predictors. Incidence rates of LTFU for ART and TB treatment were 3.90 and 19.17 per 1000 person-months of observation (PMOs), respectively. The predictors of ART LTFU included rural residence (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (SDHR): 3.39), WHO stage IV (SDHR: 2.88), haemoglobin < 11 g/dl (SDHR: 3.56), and opportunistic infections (OIs) (SDHR: 3.65). For TB treatment LTFU, significant predictors were rural residence (SDHR: 0.11), divorced (SDHR: 2.81), widowed (SDHR: 5.92), BMI < 18.5 (SDHR: 0.41), ambulatory functional status (SDHR: 2.59), adverse drug effects (SDHR: 2.87), and poor ART adherence (SDHR: 5.72). Considering errors in competing events, ART LTFU was higher among rural dwellers, individuals with advanced disease, nutritional deficits, or adverse drug effects requiring prioritised, multifaceted interventions. Targeted strategies such as intensified monitoring, adherence counselling, nutritional support, proactive management of drug-related side effects, marital instability, OIs and poor ART adherence should be integrated into the existing ART/TB program to mitigate LTFU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15985-8
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A competing risk analysis of predictors of time to lost to follow-up among adults with TB/HIV coinfection in Bahir Dar

Taye Abuhay, Yitagesu Habtu, Zemenu Addis, Getachew Hailu et al.
Scientific Reports
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

A competing risk analysis of predictors of time to lost to follow-up among adults with TB/HIV coinfection in Bahir Dar

Taye Abuhay, Yitagesu Habtu, Zemenu Addis, Getachew Hailu, Robel Demelash, Ayenew Tega, Degarege Nibret
article en

Abstract

Lost to follow-up (LTFU), defined as interrupting anti-TB treatment for ≥ 8 consecutive weeks or missing anti-retroviral therapy (ART) appointments for > 90 days, is a barrier to TB/HIV coinfection management. Poor treatment adherence, a driver of multidrug resistance in TB/HIV, poses critical challenges to case management. Overestimating effect sizes when considering mutually exclusive events, like LTFU from ART and anti-TB treatment, can occur if sources of error are not properly accounted for in competing events. However, studies estimating the effect sizes of predictors of time to LTFU using competing risk analysis are scarce. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the predictors of time to LTFU among adults with TB/HIV coinfection. We conducted a multicenter facility-based retrospective follow-up study. We randomly selected 471 TB/HIV coinfected adults. Data were extracted using standardised checklists. The LTFUs from ART and anti-TB treatment were events of interest and competing events, respectively, and others were censored. The data were entered into Epi data and then exported to Stata and Rstudio. Statistical differences were tested by Gray's test, and the cumulative incidence of each event was estimated by a cumulative incidence function. Bivariable and multivariable competing risk regression models were fitted, and variables with p values < 0.05 were considered significant predictors. Incidence rates of LTFU for ART and TB treatment were 3.90 and 19.17 per 1000 person-months of observation (PMOs), respectively. The predictors of ART LTFU included rural residence (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (SDHR): 3.39), WHO stage IV (SDHR: 2.88), haemoglobin < 11 g/dl (SDHR: 3.56), and opportunistic infections (OIs) (SDHR: 3.65). For TB treatment LTFU, significant predictors were rural residence (SDHR: 0.11), divorced (SDHR: 2.81), widowed (SDHR: 5.92), BMI < 18.5 (SDHR: 0.41), ambulatory functional status (SDHR: 2.59), adverse drug effects (SDHR: 2.87), and poor ART adherence (SDHR: 5.72). Considering errors in competing events, ART LTFU was higher among rural dwellers, individuals with advanced disease, nutritional deficits, or adverse drug effects requiring prioritised, multifaceted interventions. Targeted strategies such as intensified monitoring, adherence counselling, nutritional support, proactive management of drug-related side effects, marital instability, OIs and poor ART adherence should be integrated into the existing ART/TB program to mitigate LTFU.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Hosan University (KR), Bahir Dar University (ET)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.